Skip to main content

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different accounts of what may or may not have happened at Gatwick last week. Taking the first, ‘Significatio locutionis simplicissimæ’, two drones were sighted at Gatwick’s southern perimeter on Wednesday 19th December at 9pm and this was supported by five police officers.

This southern perimeter as you will see on Google maps around the Charlwood Rd, has a great deal of green space and is on the very edge of the 1km GPS geo-fencing that is built-in now, by software default, into most popular consumer drones.

White label and off-the-shelf, mail order drone assembly kits can of course bypass geo-fencing, so we might assume it was one of these for the sake of argument but in any event, Gatwick’s flight operations were stopped for sound safety reasons. The interruption to flights, which impacted over 100,000 passengers continued into the next day with as many as 200 reported sightings collected by the police; none of which appear to have been verified and leading me to remark on Sky News that this was ‘Somewhere between a series of unfortunate events and close encounters of the third kind.’

If we apply Ockham’s Razor to what we have in reliable evidence, then someone sent a drone into Gatwick’s airspace and most likely from the concealment of the southern side of the airport. The same exercise may or may not have repeated the ‘stunt’ on the following day. It’s quite possible the drone the police have found is indeed this one, but its operator is now long gone.

On the second day, the narrative swiftly evolved into something much more serious, driven along by the current of the media, the tabloids and public opinion. The police talked in terms of a ‘large’ and ‘advanced’ drone of a commercial size but no evidence was ever offered to support this other than eyewitness accounts which appear to have been taken mostly in the dark.

Because of the near catastrophic impact on Gatwick’s flight operations in one of the busiest weeks of the year, answers were required and the prevailing conversation shifted towards one of ‘environmental activist(s) directing an advanced and purpose-built drone, from a distance, to purposely bring the airport to a halt. All of this conjecture was supported by no tangible evidence other than the wildest speculation.

Finally, the theory started to tip towards the involvement of an even more sophisticated nation state or pseudo-terrrorist actor and swiftly descended into the realm of imaginative nonsense. This is now where we find ourselves during the break between Christmas and New Year. We can assume for the sake of argument that there were at least one or more drone incursions on the first evening but this is all we really seem to know for certain.

What followed over the next twenty-four hours appears very fuzzy indeed. Appealing to reason, I prefer to fall back on the sound advice of William of Ockham and this suggests that a single or perhaps twice repeated incident appears to have transformed into a suitable plot for the next 007 movie with an equal level of excitement and interest. Once the traffic had stopped and all around the world passengers were delayed, Gatwick needed a better story than the simplest explanation possible and the media obligingly delivered this in time for Xmas.

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…