Skip to main content

Thoughts on Chess and AI

In 1997, Gary Kasparov, one of history’s most gifted chess players, lost to Deep Blue, a $10 million specialized supercomputer programmed by a team from IBM. When I met Gary over dinner one night in London in 2001, I don’t think even he would have predicted how far and how fast the related fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning would develop in the twenty years since that match; moving beyond Chess, to Atari arcade games and finally the greatest board game challenge of them all, the game of Go.

It was Soviet mathematician and computer scientist, Alexander Kronrod’s idea that “chess is the Drosophila of artificial intelligence.” In other words, looking at chess is one way to make sense of the broader picture, just as the humble fruit fly has helped us decipher human genetics.

In today’s big data world, AI and machine learning applications already analyze massive amounts of structured and unstructured data and produce valuable insights in a fraction of the time.  A chess Grandmaster very likely holds a library of some 10,000 or more chess positions in his or her mind, and over dinner in London, I was struck by Gary Kasparov’s favorite topic, the differences between the early versions of the Encyclopedia Britannica and its most recent edition.

Kasparov appeared to me as a walking Wikipedia and I felt completely retarded in comparison with his intellect, but with the benefit of seventeen years hindsight, I think that like chess positions, he was seeing the encyclopedia as patterns and if I’m right; and it’s broadly where Kasparov appears to be coming from in his new book, it’s that 'combinatorial' partnership of man and machine, experience and algorithm, which points in the direction of the future. Kasparov realized that he could have performed better against Deep Blue if he’d had the same instant access to a massive database of all previous chess moves that Deep Blue had and it was Kasparov who pioneered the concept of ‘man-plus-machine chess matches’, (Centaur chess) in which AI augments human chess players rather than competes against them.

In 1997, when IBM’s Deep Blue defeated Kasparov, its core NegaScout planning algorithm was fourteen years old, whereas its key data set of 700,000 Grand-master chess games (known as the “The Extended Book”) was only six years old.

Now run this forward a year with Amazon Alexa or a similar AI device like Google Home or Siri. Very soon and I mean soon, you’ll be able to ask your iPad or similar what the best move in a game might be in a manner reminiscent of the iconic match between the HAL 9000 computer (Heuristic Algorithmic) and astronaut Bowman in the Stanley Kubrick movie, 2001. In theory, the computer should be able to suggest a move from anyone of perhaps millions of recorded games that led to a position of advantage in a similar position.

In a nutshell then, it’s all about pattern recognition, processor speed and powerful algorithms and it’s the latter; the code that is making the greatest difference (Martin Grotschel) that while Moore’s Law might improve a thousand times over a period, algorithms are improving 30,0000 times:
I use solving the Rubik’s cube as a good example. It’s simply an algorithm but the machine record is now down to .686 of a second.

A significant technology capability threshold has silently been crossed. We are in a kind of Cambrian explosion right now. Making sense of noisy, infinitely variable, visual and auditory patterns has been a Holy Grail of artificial intelligence. Perhaps the most important news of our day is that data sets, not algorithms, might be the key limiting factor in the development of much greater artificial intelligence. The tipping point was reached recently not by fundamentally new insights but by processing speeds that make possible larger networks, bigger data sets, more iterations and something re-discovered from the 70’s neural network research as “back-propagation” a straight-forward calculus trick

The final point, with my PlayStation tuned on in the living room and Game of Tanks waiting for me; the huge multiplayer game, is that we humans are entirely, statistically predictable. Facebook and Google know that and so does the game when I’ve played it enough times. The AI can now infer my behavior better than I can to around 98% accuracy in much the same way that Google can infer my day to day behavior and shopping habits.  It’s all about patterns and huge data sets.

Read Gary Kasparov's latest book for more insight: "Deep Thinking."

Popular posts from this blog

A Christmas Tale

It’s pitch blackness in places along the sea wall this evening and I'm momentarily startled by a small dog with orange flashing yuletide antlers along the way. I’m the only person crazy enough to be running and I know the route well enough to negotiate it in the dark, part of my Christmas exercise regime and a good way of relieving stress.

Why stress you might ask. After all, it is Christmas Day.

True but I’ve just spent over two hours assembling the giant Playmobil ‘Pony Farm’ set when most other fathers should be asleep in front of the television.

I was warned that the Playmobil ‘Pirate Ship’ had driven some fathers to drink or suicide and now I understand why. If your eyesight isn’t perfect or if you’ve had a few drinks with your Christmas lunch then it’s a challenge best left until Boxing day but not an option if you happen to have a nine year old daughter who wants it ready to take horses by tea time.

Perhaps I should stick to technology but then, the instruc…

A Matter of Drones - Simon Moores for The Guardian

I have a drone on my airfield” – a statement that welcomes passengers to the latest dimension in air-travel disruption. Words of despair from the chief operating officer of Gatwick airport in the busiest travel week of the year. Elsewhere, many thousands of stranded and inconvenienced passengers turned in frustration to social media in an expression of crowd-sourced outrage.

How could this happen? Why is it still happening over 12 hours after Gatwick’s runways were closed to aircraft, why is an intruder drone – or even two of them – suspended in the bright blue sky above the airport, apparently visible to security staff and police who remain quite unable to locate its source of radio control?

Meanwhile, the UK Civil Aviation Authority, overtaken by both the technology and events, is reduced to sending out desperate tweets warning that an airport incursion is a criminal offence and that drone users should follow their new code of conduct. Yet this is not an unforeseen event. It was i…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…