Skip to main content

The Nature of Nurture?

Edmond Greville with Mai Zetterling
Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us had been discussing on Twitter, a paper which described the A-bomb, Manhattan Project, as a ‘Hungarian School Project,’ principally because several of the leading physicist at the time were Jewish Ashkenazim. These included Manhattan Project founder Leo Szilard, H-bomb creator Edward Teller, Nobel-Prize-winning quantum physicist Eugene Wigner, and legendary polymath John von Neumann, namesake of the List Of Things Named After John Von Neumann.

Quite recently, I had my own family and my mother’s genome sequenced, with the www.23andme .com genetic testing service and this revealed a surprise. My grandfather, who we always believed was younger son of a devout Salvation Army family, turned-out to be Ashkenazim,  with some of my nearest cousins living in Russia, Ukraine and cities like Odessa.

My grandfather, Edmond T. Gréville was born on June 20, 1906 in Nice, as Edmond Greville Thonger.  almost exactly nine months after the terrible pogroms which took place in Russia and which reached a terrible peak in Odessa.

My great grandfather Richard, was a Salvation Army colonel from Birmingham, married to a French wife and they had been preaching their ministry in Nice that year, where they were associated with a local hospital.

It now appears, Edmond was adopted from that hospital and from there, the trail goes cold where his own parents are concerned but he became Edmond Greville Thonger and returned to Birmingham, where he dutifully  rattled his tambourine with his brothers and sisters at Salvation Army meetings around the country.

But Edmond was clearly very different indeed from his six siblings and this is what prompted the conversation with Professor Rutherford and others. As soon as he was old enough, he was off to France and the rest is cinema history

Quite possibly Edmond didn’t know his own history. Given his strict Protestant and relatively poor environment and upbringing  what made him  so very remarkable and so very talented or was this simply a blind expression of genetic chance; it’s a mystery. But when one considers that almost a quarter of Nobel prizes for maths and physics have gone to recipients of Ashkenazi heritage, I'm as puzzled as Richard Dawkins,  and hence the interesting discussion about the Manhattan Project and the ‘Hungarian School Science Project.’

I would say there’s nothing here which is any part evidenced,, simply interesting; i.e. 'correlation does not imply causation' but as we learn more about genetics and epigenetics and the data set of our personal genetic information expands almost exponentially, we are going to learning much more about the differences between nature and nurture very soon.

As for me, I’m just fascinated by the mystery of my grandfather, how he achieved what he did in such unusual and unique circumstances and equally grateful to Adam Rutherford for his considered answers and guidance  to the questions I posed on Twitter.

Do read his book.

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…