Skip to main content

The Elixir of Life

Another night, another ‘Leaders Debate,’ or more accurately, it’s BBC Question Time tonight with a ‘Carefully selected’ audience. Sorry BBC but on past experience one can reasonably expect a studio audience somewhat to the left of Marx; I exaggerate of course but tonight, perhaps I will be proved wrong?

What does make me cringe, and it’s common to all political parties in this General Election, is the use of ‘Skills’ or more accurately, how any Party plans to solve the ‘Skills’ problem.

Head and shoulders above his rivals and still very much catching-up with the 21st century, is Mr Corbyn, who clearly has very little idea of what the world might look like in five years, let alone ten.

I grew-up in the 1960s and 1970s. They are gone now. It wasn’t a great time for Britain’s economy and I remember doing my homework by candlelight when it was our turn for a power cut.

I was extraordinarily lucky in being sent to an American university to study; no power cuts there and one day, meeting Harold Wilson, who was introduced to me after delivering a lecture. I was reluctant to shake his hand, knowing full well the misery his Government had inflicted on my family and others back home.

Back to ‘Skills’ then and no political leader of any Party wishes to discuss ‘Lights-out factories’ or robots and artificial intelligence. Of course, they’ve all been told that the jobs that once employed millions, will soon be given over to algorithms and silicon and while the acceleration may appear slow today, it’s following what appears to be a steady upward curve, which coincides roughly with the year 2025.

I was struck by one Channel 4 news reporter visiting a former steel town and talking to local men and women who had lost their jobs and who had been advised to seek ’New skills.’

What skills are these I wonder? Machine language developer? intelligence engineer? In fact does anyone actually know what jobs will be safe from the wave of automation washing across the developed economies?

Don’t expect any answers from our politicians who are too busy fighting old battles; the NHS, education, welfare , all framed in a well-established battle language ordinary people understand and even expect.  None of these political careerists really want to confront the really difficult questions, simply because few or none of them can answer them with any accuracy or indeed honesty.

Back in the 19th century, some patent medicines, like “The Elixir of Life” sold by a Dr. James W. Kidd, of Fort Wayne, Indiana, went so far as to promise immortality, deliverance from the greatest fear of all. With only a week before our next General Election, this is possibly the only promise that none of the political parties will try and offer the electorate in return for their vote; although I might not put it past UKIP?

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…