Skip to main content

Swinging Voters.

One of those windy, hot summer’s days, which makes my life as a pilot, (weekend job) awkward when trying to thread an aircraft with precision, between two poles, ten feet off the ground.

Back home again and time to relax before my dinner of Quorn burgers. I’ve given-up on meat both for ethical and health reasons and to be honest, I rarely miss it now and feel rather better for the change. It was all prompted by reading Yuval Noah Harari’s book, ‘Homo Deus’ when I was on the way to give a talk in Abu Dhabi and I haven’t looked back since.

As I was away, speaking at a conference yesterday and didn’t arrive home until late, I managed to avoid writing my own thoughts on the results of our dysfunctional General Election, like a million other people. Without going into any great detail, because you all likely know it by now, several things struck me most about the result.

Firstly, reportedly 120 people out of over 40 million voters decided the result in removing the Government’s overall majority in Parliament, with surprise victories for Labour in constituencies, like Canterbury, next door and Kensington. This was an election result across a nation, swung by less than the number of people who can fit into our local cinema, once all the recounts and results were in.

Secondly, Diane Abbott, who conclusively proved to us all she isn’t the sharpest tool in Labour’s political box, was returned with an even greater majority; proving that populism and competence occupy quite different trajectories.

 Lastly, the young and social media determined the result and a complete sea-change in British politics, where newspapers have little or no impact on perceptions anymore.

My daughter’s generation may never have bought a newspaper and receive all their news, with a powerful confirmation bias I suspect, from friends and social media. They don’t watch TV news. Television is a means of serving-up Netflix and Amazon and BBC iPlayer, so advertisers should be worrying too.

The world has changed in twelve months, Donald Trump is President and Jeremy Corbyn is Obi Wan Kenobi incarnate. He has, in a few short months since I met him, learned to knot his tie and bought a decent suit. Who would have thought it in 2016?

And the policies? The Conservatives learned that ‘Going-after’ small businesses and pensioners was a really bad idea and Theresa may learned that a pair of Jimmy Choo stilettos doesn’t automatically make the wearer a worthy successor to Margaret Thatcher.

I’ll pass over the LibDems with a shrug and straight to Labour, whose policies and magnificent ‘Money Tree’ avoided proper scrutiny, simply because the Prime Minister was busily occupied shooting herself firmly in both feet - she may have removed her expensive ‘Jimmy Choos’ first.

A generation of students have been promised ‘Free stuff’ and redundant factory workers have been promised jobs that no longer have any value or purpose in a global economy; much like Donald Trump reintroducing coal to keep Virginia’s miners happy while elsewhere renewables are the bright future of the clean energy business.

Much like my generation having no memory of the world described in George Orwell’s “Road to Wigan Pier.” today's students have little interest in the history of IRA terrorism or even the vaguest familiarity with Stalinism or the German Democratic Republic. “A generation ago every intelligent person was, in some sense a revolutionary,” wrote George Orwell and in my time it Was the Red Brigades or Baader Meinhof  two violent and radical ideologies the European young embraced. Today, it’s more peaceful and ‘Green’ but I would argue, equally delusional and represented by Jeremy Corbyn and his disciples. However, what we don’t learn from history, we are invariably forced to repeat and to conclude with another quote from George Orwell:

“It hardly needs pointing out that at this moment we are in a very serious mess."

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…