Skip to main content

Newspeak - Orwell was Right.

What to write, or indeed, what it might even be appropriate to write tonight?

Another terrorist incident, this time in London, has lines of counter-terrorism and counter-extremism experts, lining-up to offer their mix of platitudes and opinions to the media.

In front of No10. the Prime Minister is once again warning of the very visible threat from a demonstrably violent and radical Salafi Islamic orthodoxy. Urging us she needs to be able to introduce legislation to take greater control of both internet 'Safe Spaces' and encryption.

I’m suddenly reminded of George Orwell’s ’Newspeak’ from his novel, 1984. It’s defined as “Ambiguous, euphemistic language used chiefly in political propaganda.’ The objective, to ensure universal orthodoxy of ideology and politics among the the people.

Orwell, explains that Newspeak is a language characterised by a continually diminishing vocabulary, “Complete thoughts reduced to simple terms of simplistic meaning,’ and that, I fear is where our social narrative is heading in 2017.

I rather think that most of the population is intelligent enough to understand what is going-on around them; particularly when events like last night’s unfold on the different news channels. However and at times, it all feels like we live in some kind of ‘Alice in Wonderland’ reality, where objective reality has very blurred edges.

Where do we go from here? Charles Arthur’s excellent piece in The Guardian, explains why Government ‘Going-after’ Facebook or Google isn’t going to achieve much if anything. As Thomas Rid points-out on Twitter: “If the UK continues trying to roll back core liberal values by messing with an open and secure internet, then the terrorists win.”

All the different and extremely expensive anti-radicalism measures appear to have failed miserably as well, in part because unless you have lived ‘Among the believers’ it’s almost impossibly difficult for our liberal Western minds to understand the nature of the belief that drives them. AsDavid Allen Green tells us:  'There have been so many terrorism statutes since 2000 Government has run out of names for them: Terrorism Act, Anti-Terrorism Act, Counter-Terrorism Act."

If there are any certainties remaining in Britain today, then among them has to be the suggestion we need to tear-up the script and start again. Rather than reject what we don't wish to hear,we may take another quote from George Orwell, who also wrote: "The time has come for intelligent men to re-state the obvious.'

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…