Skip to main content

Newspeak - Orwell was Right.

What to write, or indeed, what it might even be appropriate to write tonight?

Another terrorist incident, this time in London, has lines of counter-terrorism and counter-extremism experts, lining-up to offer their mix of platitudes and opinions to the media.

In front of No10. the Prime Minister is once again warning of the very visible threat from a demonstrably violent and radical Salafi Islamic orthodoxy. Urging us she needs to be able to introduce legislation to take greater control of both internet 'Safe Spaces' and encryption.

I’m suddenly reminded of George Orwell’s ’Newspeak’ from his novel, 1984. It’s defined as “Ambiguous, euphemistic language used chiefly in political propaganda.’ The objective, to ensure universal orthodoxy of ideology and politics among the the people.

Orwell, explains that Newspeak is a language characterised by a continually diminishing vocabulary, “Complete thoughts reduced to simple terms of simplistic meaning,’ and that, I fear is where our social narrative is heading in 2017.

I rather think that most of the population is intelligent enough to understand what is going-on around them; particularly when events like last night’s unfold on the different news channels. However and at times, it all feels like we live in some kind of ‘Alice in Wonderland’ reality, where objective reality has very blurred edges.

Where do we go from here? Charles Arthur’s excellent piece in The Guardian, explains why Government ‘Going-after’ Facebook or Google isn’t going to achieve much if anything. As Thomas Rid points-out on Twitter: “If the UK continues trying to roll back core liberal values by messing with an open and secure internet, then the terrorists win.”

All the different and extremely expensive anti-radicalism measures appear to have failed miserably as well, in part because unless you have lived ‘Among the believers’ it’s almost impossibly difficult for our liberal Western minds to understand the nature of the belief that drives them. AsDavid Allen Green tells us:  'There have been so many terrorism statutes since 2000 Government has run out of names for them: Terrorism Act, Anti-Terrorism Act, Counter-Terrorism Act."

If there are any certainties remaining in Britain today, then among them has to be the suggestion we need to tear-up the script and start again. Rather than reject what we don't wish to hear,we may take another quote from George Orwell, who also wrote: "The time has come for intelligent men to re-state the obvious.'

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…