Skip to main content

New Technologies are Not an Answer to a Politician's Prayers

I’m rather wondering if we are hovering on the edge of a precipice? A week, being a very long time in politics, will tell.

I heard repeated references to ’New technologies” on BBC Question Time, last night and it did all rather remind me of the Fuehrer’s ‘Miracle weapons’ of another century.

These new technologies will, like the new skills I referred to in my last weblog, transform the UK economy and its workforce, introducing a well-paid utopia in which all will share equally.

Or will they? Call me a cynic but won’t these same miracle technologies also be available in China or indeed the United States or Germany, where technology investment is invariably higher than the UK and whose societies share the same problem that we do?

I was reading on Bloomberg today how Morgan Stanley is introducing algorithms, not only to support their trading but also to replace many of their highly paid brokers. Pause for a moment to consider what re-skilling is required of a broker earning close to half a million dollars a year, being replaced by a black box?

And so the BBC’s Question time interrogation of our Prime Minister and our Leader of the Opposition was quite predictable. “We want more money.” “We don’t trust what you say.” “The NHS is creaking under the weight of an ageing population.All firefighting today’s big issues and giving very little thought to tomorrow’s.

What happens when we start to live to 125 and it’s normal? What happens when so many genetic and disease-causing mutations are passed into the general population, when in the past, natural selection would have weeded them and indeed, perhaps people like me out? You only have to consider the very different health profiles between factory farmed and free-range Salmon which of course don't carry any form of health-insurance.

Can we count on genetic science delivering miracle cures for all those 21st-century lifestyle ailments which are steadily throttling the NHS with costs and faltering resources? Of course we can’t.

Who pays to look after me when I’m hundred, when my house is sold and my pension and savings are exhausted? Certainly not Google or Facebook or Amazon. And the Government, forget it. Oh, I forgot, it will be the taxes raised on all those new technologies, platform businesses which will exist virtually, domiciled for tax purposes in the Virgin Islands, Luxembourg or the Irish Republic no doubt?

Or just maybe, somebody will find that money tree we have heard so much about?

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…