Skip to main content

With Each Passing Week

Following on from yesterday's e-crime congress, Mid-year Forum in London, I had a few thoughts, based on the presentations and my own ideas of the constantly evolving risks we face.

William Gibson
So let's accept that that the arrival of the 'Internet of Things' and 'Always-on' technologies is creating a constantly growing surface opportunity for the kinds of sophisticated criminals that once use to exist only in the imagination of the science-fiction author, William Gibson.

What concerns me after a decade of chairing and speaking at e-crime and info security conferences, is the shortage of new and even radical ideas and answers, as business and industry struggles to keep pace with the parabolic curve of exploitation, vulnerability and criminal opportunity.

In the middle of the biggest recession in sixty years, many businesses are even more focused on cutting their technology costs that building a resilient defense posture and the language of risk has changed very little over the last five years.

Most organisations are now on familiar terms with 'Blended threats,' 'Advanced Persistent Threats,'  'Denial of Service,' 'Spyware,' 'Crimeware,' 'Malware' and much of the depressingly expanding lexicon of e-crime.

Yesterday, we heard that 'security solutions are fractured' and new strategies are enabling hackers to hide malicious traffic where security doesn't know where to look. I'm worried we are so busy looking on one familiar direction, that we may not be keeping-up with the arms race, as it evolves in quite different directions, the subject of cyber-warfare and terrorism aside and that may now be heading towards the theft, aggregation and analysis of what is increasingly described as 'Big Data.'

The kinds of  Big Data tools that were once only available to wealthy corporations are increasingly within-range of well-funded criminal gangs who can buy a new generation of cloud-based services on demand.  to achieve their goals. What these might be or even look like, it's hard to say but if you take the underground economy as it is today and project the direction of its potential evolution, then some conclusions are unavoidable, even if these are simply speculation for now.

There's absolutely no doubt that we know a great deal about risk and exploitation, after all, it's an almost daily occurrence for large organisations today. A $20 billion dollar industry has a vast army of useful and frequently effective point solutions but the evidence clearly shows that no amount of investment in security offers any form of magic bullet against the risk of compromise or data theft from an army of highly sophisticated and motivated adversaries.

The security industry reminds me of a traditional Egyptian market. Crowded, busy and with some of the  merchandise on offer varying very little over the years; just the packaging changes colour.

If I'm not going to be back wringing my hands over the landscape of risk in another decade, much like a did with my 'Trustworthy Computing Report' in 2002, then we need to see the industry or the analysts stepping-up with some new and original ideas to challenge an arms race which I would argue we are in danger of losing, inch by inch with each passing week.

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…