Skip to main content

No Escape

Escape from the office for two days and one is invariably made to suffer an email backlog once reality catches up again.

I was training over at Bicester as the newest member of the GliderFX team getting my air show display license from the CAA. In my own case, it means that I can operate down to 150 feet and in this example it means that instead of a banner, I’m towing a high performance glider in rolling 360 degree snaps along a display line. Here’s a cockpit view for anyone who might be interested and it looks as if the first show of the season will be Abingdon although they’ve gone as far as Turkmenistan before!

The tug is a 250hp Pawnee with a big rudder and I can confess that making sixty degree, tight turns at low level, with a second aircraft attached, does concentrate the mind wonderfully and as sure as hell is painful on the leg muscles as one tries to balance the forces with the rudder pedals.



Flying back home yesterday evening, I was pretty sure that I heard Prince Harry buzzing in his Apache helicopter on a training exercise, his voice being quite distinctive. The word is that he will be playing his part patrolling the Olympic airspace next summer but I don’t quite understand yet what rules of engagement the Government could possibly offer such a heavily armed machine in the densely built-up area that surrounds London.

Speaking of ‘Buzz’, the Turner opening seems to be generating it’s own background excitement and tonight is one of the special previews. The good news is that the long-term weather forecast for Saturday looks very promising and it would excellent if we could show Thanet at its best and most attractive to the media when they descend on us next Saturday morning.

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…