Skip to main content

Watching the Detectives

Watching from the sidelines, it’s interesting how the on-going WikiLeaks story is encouraging a conceptual shift in information security thinking.

Today’s virtual battlefield offers parallels with the Maginot Line philosophy before the outbreak of the Second World War; lots of trenches, barbed wire,’ impregnable’ fortresses and firewalls, a hardened security layer designed to hamper infiltration and movement and slow-down any digital attack on business assets. When U.S. Army private, Bradley Manning, an information analyst, allegedly passed hundreds of thousands of classified State Department cables to WikiLeaks on re-written music CDs, he revealed what many of us knew already, that a $20 billion a year global information security industry can be proved quite helpless against the weakest and most disgruntled link in the organisational security chain.

It can be argued that WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange’s biggest tactical mistake was not that of revealing classified United States diplomatic cables but rather threatening to publish sensitive commercial information ‘leaked’ from one of the country’s largest banks. Last week, when news of this first broke, shares of Bank of America fell more than 10 percent. Where government’s may be forced to act transparently, banks are a little different and it very much looked as if through self-interest, they were encouraged to join-ranks against a common threat, through the simple expedient of cutting WikiLeaks and Assange off from funds and sources of credit, prompting the swift retaliation, in the form of DDOS attacks this week, from Assange’s supporters against the payment providers and hosting services involved, such as MasterCard and Paypal and Amazon. Even Twitter has appeared in the firing line.

So, if you’re a business, what does all this fuss about stolen diplomatic gossip mean to you and indeed, do you really care? Security solutions specialist, Cryptic Software might argue that the protection of sensitive information assets through the availability of a unified and proactive approach is a priority that any organisation ignores at its peril. From a business perspective, the most damaging security breaches frequently occur on the inside of the corporate firewall and are either noticed too late or not at all. Where a distributed denial of service attack may effectively remove an organisation from the Web for a short period, the consequences may be painful but not indefinite. Losing a million customer records and bank details to an employee may be a little harder to swallow and so a security layer involving monitoring, reporting and forensic tools offers a simple answer to a serious risk.

The lesson being offered by the Wikileaks story and the argument posed by Cryptic Software are clear to anyone to cares to place them in context. The larger the organisation the heavier the potential fall where tunnel vision is focused at sanitising the digital perimeter of the organisation and ignores the simple human risk from within. Secondly and for purposes of simple compliance and governance, an organisation needs to be able to produce an audit trail for its commercially sensitive assets and have some automated means of alerting in place when large amounts of data start being moved and copied in a manner that both breaches policy and might encourage suspicion.

The US military and HMRC aren’t the first organisations to lose huge volumes of data and they won’t be the last But thanks to Assange and WikiLeaks business is starting to wake-up to the idea that a sizeable real-estate security investment in the Maginot Line isn’t going to offer much reassurance when the back door to the organisation is left exposed to an unhappy employee with a personal mission, armed with a tiny weapon of mass-destruction, a simple and inexpensive, thumb-sized 100Gb USB drive!

Popular posts from this blog

A Christmas Tale

It’s pitch blackness in places along the sea wall this evening and I'm momentarily startled by a small dog with orange flashing yuletide antlers along the way. I’m the only person crazy enough to be running and I know the route well enough to negotiate it in the dark, part of my Christmas exercise regime and a good way of relieving stress.

Why stress you might ask. After all, it is Christmas Day.

True but I’ve just spent over two hours assembling the giant Playmobil ‘Pony Farm’ set when most other fathers should be asleep in front of the television.



I was warned that the Playmobil ‘Pirate Ship’ had driven some fathers to drink or suicide and now I understand why. If your eyesight isn’t perfect or if you’ve had a few drinks with your Christmas lunch then it’s a challenge best left until Boxing day but not an option if you happen to have a nine year old daughter who wants it ready to take horses by tea time.

Perhaps I should stick to technology but then, the instruc…

A Matter of Drones - Simon Moores for The Guardian

I have a drone on my airfield” – a statement that welcomes passengers to the latest dimension in air-travel disruption. Words of despair from the chief operating officer of Gatwick airport in the busiest travel week of the year. Elsewhere, many thousands of stranded and inconvenienced passengers turned in frustration to social media in an expression of crowd-sourced outrage.

How could this happen? Why is it still happening over 12 hours after Gatwick’s runways were closed to aircraft, why is an intruder drone – or even two of them – suspended in the bright blue sky above the airport, apparently visible to security staff and police who remain quite unable to locate its source of radio control?

Meanwhile, the UK Civil Aviation Authority, overtaken by both the technology and events, is reduced to sending out desperate tweets warning that an airport incursion is a criminal offence and that drone users should follow their new code of conduct. Yet this is not an unforeseen event. It was i…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…