Skip to main content

A Cut Above

The expression that springs directly to mind is ‘SmartGov’ and for me at least, it describes what is going to be a very difficult time for local government in the years ahead.

I was fortunate to be present at the very beginning of the eGovernment revolution which changed the face of public services. Generous investment, the internet and the arrival of new technologies, gave the public unprecedented access to local government and streamlined, processes, such as planning and benefits, which had once been Byzantine and impenetrable.

In 2009 one might argue that local government now finds itself at the wrong end of two financial cycles. The first involves the growing costs of a ‘technology refresh’ and the second, the more serious implications that now surround the public sector financial crisis; the worst since the end of the Second World War.

Councils are now struggling to cope with the fallout from the recession and are facing the prospect of as much as a 30% cut in their central Government support if Treasury forecasts for the economy prove too optimistic. This in turn could lead to even larger cuts for some public services as the more essential are protected.

With the public sector now facing a period of unparalleled financial austerity, the effective use of technology becomes even more of a driving force in maintaining services, as both the budget and the workforce come under threat. Collectively, we need to genuinely re-think aspects of public service design and the pivotal role that technology plays in its consequent operation.

We have however very limited room to manoeuvre and I was at a meeting of several neighbouring councils last month, where we spent half a day exploring the shared services route. Having had an alarming presentation on the prospect of ‘Financial Armageddon’, it was made clear that we had a very limited time window in which to both achieve harsh cuts in our budgets and create, from near thin air, a cost effective shared services plan.

My own council, Thanet, has just published its 2009 strategy and in its pages, you will find not only a commitment to the development of shared services to exploit Kent Connects and the Kent Public Services Network (KPSN) but the introduction of Thin client computing technologies , Open Source Software and a long-overdue migration from Novell’s GroupWise. All of this will have to be implemented within the budget I have available.

It’s my own experience that the very nature of the public procurement procedure, invariably means that in contrast with the private sector, what we have available in terms of ICT is frequently behind the curve, a result of the lowest bidder process and often several years out of date. As a consequence, we need to be more joined-up, increasingly smarter in the way in which we integrate different processes and innovative in the way in which we use our existing solutions and partnerships with other authorities.

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…