Skip to main content

Kalashnikov Theory at Heathrow Terminal 5

My "Kalashnikov theory" of technology found itself into the Observer newspaper this morning to describe one element of the chaos at British Airway's new Terminal 5.0.

"Systems analysts talk about the Kalashnikov theory. 'We speak all the time about people, processes and technology, but people are steadily being eliminated from the equation and a large organisation can't do away with them altogether,' said Dr Simon Moores, a veteran IT expert who advises the likes of Microsoft and the Conservative party. 'Hence solutions should be like the Kalashnikov rifle: modular. You can buy an AK47 that has a Chinese receiver, a Czech barrel and a Russian frame in an African bazaar and it still won't jam because all the parts fit together."

I originally used the expression in my frequent eGovernment trips to the Arab world. I think the last occasion may have been in Bahrain with a speech entitled: 'The eGovernment Challenge in the Middle East', as an easily grasped illustration of the problems that many countries in the region were facing from the rapid implementation of new technology but I never thought it might find its way back to Heathrow to describe the shambles at Terminal 5.0.

In summary, I said that any large, mission critical and complex system need to be robust and fault tolerant and the AK47 Kalashnikov rifle should be the image at the forefront of the designer's mind rather than a BMW car. We need to remember that systems fail and they do so with monotonous and expensive regularity and a modular and tough approach to the challenges of sand and people is frequently a better solution than a sleek and refined vehicle that can break down and needs maintenance when a light bulb blows!

* The Kalashnikov theory assumes that the larger, more mission-critical and ambitious the project, the greater the potential for failure during its introduction. It takes a common sense view that technology is invariably oversold and that in a large scale, public facing project, there is a reluctance to invest in training the workforce to deal with the contingency risk of failure.

* Society is littered with the expensive and embarrassing failures of expensive and grandiose IT projects. More visibly in the public sector where the catastrophes are normally greater by an order of magnitude.

* Large companies invest in big technology and look for any opportunity to downsize or outsource the workforce in the relentless search for profits. If or when that technology fails or performs to live up to expectations, the business, lacking any other resources is unable to respond effectively and it cannot fall back on its infantry, when it exists behind a telephone line or a webpage. Lacking any true business resilience, customer service invariably collapses as a result and reputation is damaged.

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…