Skip to main content

Kalashnikov Theory at Heathrow Terminal 5

My "Kalashnikov theory" of technology found itself into the Observer newspaper this morning to describe one element of the chaos at British Airway's new Terminal 5.0.

"Systems analysts talk about the Kalashnikov theory. 'We speak all the time about people, processes and technology, but people are steadily being eliminated from the equation and a large organisation can't do away with them altogether,' said Dr Simon Moores, a veteran IT expert who advises the likes of Microsoft and the Conservative party. 'Hence solutions should be like the Kalashnikov rifle: modular. You can buy an AK47 that has a Chinese receiver, a Czech barrel and a Russian frame in an African bazaar and it still won't jam because all the parts fit together."

I originally used the expression in my frequent eGovernment trips to the Arab world. I think the last occasion may have been in Bahrain with a speech entitled: 'The eGovernment Challenge in the Middle East', as an easily grasped illustration of the problems that many countries in the region were facing from the rapid implementation of new technology but I never thought it might find its way back to Heathrow to describe the shambles at Terminal 5.0.

In summary, I said that any large, mission critical and complex system need to be robust and fault tolerant and the AK47 Kalashnikov rifle should be the image at the forefront of the designer's mind rather than a BMW car. We need to remember that systems fail and they do so with monotonous and expensive regularity and a modular and tough approach to the challenges of sand and people is frequently a better solution than a sleek and refined vehicle that can break down and needs maintenance when a light bulb blows!

* The Kalashnikov theory assumes that the larger, more mission-critical and ambitious the project, the greater the potential for failure during its introduction. It takes a common sense view that technology is invariably oversold and that in a large scale, public facing project, there is a reluctance to invest in training the workforce to deal with the contingency risk of failure.

* Society is littered with the expensive and embarrassing failures of expensive and grandiose IT projects. More visibly in the public sector where the catastrophes are normally greater by an order of magnitude.

* Large companies invest in big technology and look for any opportunity to downsize or outsource the workforce in the relentless search for profits. If or when that technology fails or performs to live up to expectations, the business, lacking any other resources is unable to respond effectively and it cannot fall back on its infantry, when it exists behind a telephone line or a webpage. Lacking any true business resilience, customer service invariably collapses as a result and reputation is damaged.

Popular posts from this blog

A Christmas Tale

It’s pitch blackness in places along the sea wall this evening and I'm momentarily startled by a small dog with orange flashing yuletide antlers along the way. I’m the only person crazy enough to be running and I know the route well enough to negotiate it in the dark, part of my Christmas exercise regime and a good way of relieving stress.

Why stress you might ask. After all, it is Christmas Day.

True but I’ve just spent over two hours assembling the giant Playmobil ‘Pony Farm’ set when most other fathers should be asleep in front of the television.



I was warned that the Playmobil ‘Pirate Ship’ had driven some fathers to drink or suicide and now I understand why. If your eyesight isn’t perfect or if you’ve had a few drinks with your Christmas lunch then it’s a challenge best left until Boxing day but not an option if you happen to have a nine year old daughter who wants it ready to take horses by tea time.

Perhaps I should stick to technology but then, the instruc…

A Matter of Drones - Simon Moores for The Guardian

I have a drone on my airfield” – a statement that welcomes passengers to the latest dimension in air-travel disruption. Words of despair from the chief operating officer of Gatwick airport in the busiest travel week of the year. Elsewhere, many thousands of stranded and inconvenienced passengers turned in frustration to social media in an expression of crowd-sourced outrage.

How could this happen? Why is it still happening over 12 hours after Gatwick’s runways were closed to aircraft, why is an intruder drone – or even two of them – suspended in the bright blue sky above the airport, apparently visible to security staff and police who remain quite unable to locate its source of radio control?

Meanwhile, the UK Civil Aviation Authority, overtaken by both the technology and events, is reduced to sending out desperate tweets warning that an airport incursion is a criminal offence and that drone users should follow their new code of conduct. Yet this is not an unforeseen event. It was i…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…