Skip to main content

Snared

I was horrified to find a virus on my PC this morning. It’s called W32.Blackmal and my Norton Anti-virus programme picked it up automatically. The worry though is whether it found its way onto my hard disk before the automatic update that ran this morning.

Looking up the virus payload on the internet, I see that it attempts to delete one’s security settings in Windows and disable the resident anti-virus program, so that it can harvest one’s address book and then use it to send out more copies of itself to anyone in it. The worrying sign is that my Norton anti-virus program is ‘hanging’ when I try and scan.

Internet security is of course one of the things I do professionally and being caught-out is almost unheard of. This is probably a lesson to all of us using a home computer, in this case a ‘shared’ wireless laptop. Particularly where children are concerned, there are dummy sites out there that have been deliberately set-up to lure them into a visit, normally via an innocent search for a favourite programme or character across Google, Yahoo or some other engine. What happens then is that the virus may be attached to an image, which when viewed with low security settings or an out of date anti-virus programme, will neatly drop the virus payload onto the visiting Personal Computer.

This is a simplified explanation but remember, that your security is only as good as your last security update and even then, if you leave settings, such as ActiveX controls turned on, there’s always a risk of catching something nasty. It could be a simple irritation or it could be one of the new generation of ‘blended’ threats, that actively seeks to steal anything that looks like personal or financial information from your PC, bank account log-in scripts and so on, which are then emailed to Yuri and his mates, somewhere between Estonia and Petroplavosk.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…