Skip to main content

Life on Mars

Who remembers the eighties? It was the best of times for those of us working in technology and at the time, columnists like me predicted a future, driven by the march of progress, that would make doing business cheaper and more efficient and would give each of us more leisure time and less stress as a consequence.

How wrong could I be? Yesterday’s future is today’s present and technology, much like the world of the “Matrix” consumes budgets with an insatiable appetite that has quite the opposite effect to that we imagined twenty years ago.

Can you still recall what the world was like before the arrival of the call centre, the speed camera and the Blackberry, when a holiday meant that nobody could find you for two weeks and when the public sector still relied on the typewriter and the telephone?

This week we heard that Council tax bills are to increase by more than twice the level of inflation this year, marking a doubling of the property tax in just ten years. At a central government level, billions of pounds of public money will be thrown at the National Programme for IT (NPfIT) and the up and coming national identity card project, leading the LSE’s Professor Ian Angell to comment on the latter "Any companies involved in IT should stick their snout in the trough now, because it's going to be a gravy train.”This is a huge opportunity for IT companies, as there are no downsides. Bid for everything, the system will be so huge; there won't be enough manpower in the country to deliver. And you can put in ridiculous prices, because the system won't work.”

An observer from another planet might think that by introducing the benefits of new technology and the internet to business and the public sector over the last twenty years, both would become smaller and more cost efficient. Instead the opposite appears to have happened. Visit a supermarket and you’ll see that clothes and food are now much cheaper than they were twenty years ago, with more choice on offer but consumers and taxpayers are increasingly the unhappy victims of the arrival of new technology in the workplace.

In theory, the introduction of electronic government and business process re-engineering concepts, should have led to a more streamlined public sector, calling on equally slim public/private partnerships to deliver cost-effective and competitive services to the population. Instead, many of us see the evidence of an expensive shambles and an exercise in self justification by local and central government. Lots of expensive, Guardian-advertised jobs and higher taxes to pay for local and central services, which like the Child Support Agency or the Tax Credits system, squander huge amounts of public money on wasteful, ill-conceived projects, dreamt-up by a handful of very large IT suppliers in collusion with our very naive political leaders.

Bureaucracy said Karl Marx, is the ultimate purpose of the state and business is suffocated by red tape and squeezed by compliance and expensive IT costs. Government continues to expand and uses IT as an instrument of control and taxation on a population which no longer believes in the value of the democratic process.

Last week, I chaired an electronic government conference with papers delivered from countries as far afield as Scotland, Taiwan and Singapore. What I concluded from the event was that while the arrival of new technology can add-value and speed-up some processes, it can make others worse and lead to the appearance of a single point of failure which has a knock-on effect downstream.

In reality and like seeking the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, chasing technology has become the new purpose of government and while the public sector talks bravely on efficiencies and shared services it becomes ever more expensive and people-intensive to run, leaving me to ask if what we have today, is really any better than what we paid much less for in our taxes twenty years ago?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …