Skip to main content

David Davis at University of Kent

I went to hear David Davis speak at The University of Kent in Canterbury last night and must admit that I left with a much more positive impression of his potential ability, as a leader of the Conservative Party.

Davis spoke for two hours without notes, which was enough to dismiss the media suggestion that he’s a poor orator. He obviously stumbled at Blackpool but appears to have recovered his composure since then and I found him very lucid quick and ready to answer questions from his audience and at times, quite entertaining.

Over the course of the evening, I jotted-down several of his comments which I’ll share with those of you who are interested:

  • “Why is government so unpopular? Three words, Mandelson, Byers and Blunkett.”

  • “Trust in all politicians has been undermined by Tony Blair.”

  • “One third of the population depend on the state for half their income.”

  • “A £billion each year is being wasted by audit and Whitehall control of local council services.”

  • “A Conservative government would repeal, replace or reform the Human Rights Act.”

  • “A Conservative government would reverse the damage to the pension system and occupational pension schemes.”
Answering a question from a retired serviceman, asking what a Conservative government would do to address a situation where our soldiers are poorly supplied, often poorly armed and frequently have to buy their own kit, Davis quipped that the first thing he would like to do away with would be the Ministry of Defense but there would be a serious review of our military commitments, the size of our army, which he viewed as being under-strength for demands and military adventures made upon it by Mr Blair and the way in which troops are supplied, to avoid more tragedies, like the one involving a Sergeant in Iraq, giving his flak jacket to another soldier, because there weren’t enough to go around.

To be honest, David Davis presented himself as very much as a solid character and a man to be trusted with a difficult job rather than the collection of perfectly-timed Six O’clock news soundbites that we have come to expect from the Prime Minister. But do the British people want the kind of straight “Say it as you see it” personality of David Davis or are we too far down the Presidential road of New Labour, a TV mini-series with a constantly twisting storyline that looks set to run for a few more years yet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…