Copyright Extension As A Game Of Leapfrog


The Times Online has an excellent editorial explaining copyright extension in the UK makes no sense and would actually be harmful to the "creative industries" said minister is supposed to be protecting. The arguments made in the article are mostly familiar to those who read Techdirt often enough -- though, it's still a worthwhile read. One especially amusing point, though, shows how both sides of the Atlantic seem to be justifying copyright extension by using a "leapfrog" process. That is, when the Sonny Bono copyright term extension act was put in place, part of his argument was that the US had less strict copyright protection than Europe, and we needed to extend copyright to keep things in line or else it would be "hard to do business" with our friends across the pond. Of course, the extension then went beyond what Europe had (leading to the debate today), so now one of the reasons for pushing for copyright extension in Europe is because the differences make it "hard to do business" going in the other direction. That's quite a scam. As long as each side keeps leapfrogging the other, they can extend copyrights virtually forever using the same claim. [via Techdirt]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

The Nature of Nurture?