Skip to main content
The Irish Software Economy

A very pleasant dinner last night at the Irish Embassy in London, hosted by Ambassador Daithi O’Ceallaigh and the country’s Minister for International Trade, Michael Ahern T.D.

Ireland, the “Celtic Tiger Economy”, Ahern tells me, exports £1 billion of IT goods annually with a further £240 million of services, in 2004, up 8% on the year before. Of course, one of Ireland’s principal trade partners is the UK, with a balanced two-way trade of £20 billion and an overall IT spend of £74 billion, which Irish companies would like a share of, in areas like our National Programme for IT.

Ireland is a member of the “Three I’s Club”, India, Israel and Ireland, each one wishing to be a significant global player in the IT development, production and service sectors and Ireland happens to be the largest exporter of software in the world, because so many large companies base their European production operations in the country.

I’m speaking at the Irish Software Association’s annual conference next week and I’ll be warning that while Ireland has made remarkable achievements in IT, complacency is a real danger, as is the country’s reliance on packaged software production from multi-national companies that can be swiftly switched to the next tax-friendly member of the European Union and beyond. There’s a huge amount for Ireland to be proud of in its record of achievement and employment to date but like the UK, its government has to grasp the implicit challenge in infrastructure, investment and education that lies behind any aspiration towards becoming a true knowledge economy and not simply “A software sweatshop” a one of my dinner companions from a Dublin company remarked at dinner.


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…