Skip to main content
Immortality Inc

It’s a presentation to the management board of one of one of the UK’s best known brands and I’m dusting-off my old Rubik’s Cube that had been occupying a place of honour in a box in the attic.


Budget Zen Garden

The talk has me trying to predict how new and evolving technology will impact their online business in the next three to five years and the Rubik’s Cube is a stage “Prop” I’m using to illustrate the interaction between the six key trends that I believe will play a part in their business planning.

I’ll admit that I never managed to solve Rubik’s three-dimensional puzzle as I was older than twelve when it first appeared. But if you stick labels with “Web Services”, “Security”, “Storage” and three more issues on the six sides of the cube and then imagine rotating the sides in a Rubik shuffle, you may grasp more clearly what I mean.

In reality and for any business now relying on technology, I’m now up to eleven dimensions which rather illustrate the complex nature of the predictive process once these have all been shuffled into each other.

There are other commercial factors to take into account of as well, European patents legislation being just one to worry about. The current patent frenzy surrounding the grey area between business methods and technical effects, recently led the Economist Magazine to comment “As the value that society places on intellectual property has increased, many companies have rushed to patent as many, often dubious, ideas as possible in an effort to erect legal obstacles to competitors.”

In my view, it’s quite possible, that at some point in the not too distant future, a company will develop a process, which is capable of prolonging human life almost indefinitely, interrupting the ageing process which is at an advanced stage in laboratory animals. Having discovered the “Elixir of Life”, it will be swiftly patented and priced to achieve maximum profitability. At this point it becomes interesting to speculate on the consequences of such a patent being protected by US legislation?

From a predictive position, the right technology may accelerate and optimise business processes but the risk of choosing the wrong technology is now at an all-time, uncomfortable high. The Rubik’s Cube analogy starts with a uniform technology or trend, displayed in a single colour on each of the six sides of the cube but shuffle these together in three twists of the wrist and you’re left with the real face of progress, the integration, reliability and complexity problem that confronts any sizeable business.

Last week, I was struck by the size of the Infosec Show in London. The first image that sprang to mind was the end sequence of Monty Python’s life of Brian, with the cast, hanging on their crosses and singing, “Always look on the bright side of life.”

Infosec is an illustration of one of the faces of my eleven-sided Rubik’s Cube in action. In an industry worth over $20 billion a year, everyone has a solution but not necessarily the universal solution to your security problems that can interoperate successfully with all the technology challenges out there.

Ultimately, all one can do is prepare the management of a company for what might lie downstream. As an example, we’re starting to see the young migrating to video-phones and the emerging parallel world of the iPod existence, because "The internet is for homework and geeks. “ However, it’s a good sign when the management team of a large company are prepared to give a concentrated forty-five minutes thought towards what I suspect should be anticipating as a business towards 2008. As long as nobody tries to shuffle my Rubik’s Cube I’ll be fine.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…