Skip to main content
Weblogs – The New Pirate Radio of the 21st Century

Britain hasn’t yet woken-up to the influence of Blogging to the same degree as the Americans have. In fact Weblogs are claimed to have made a significant contribution to the results of the last US Presidential election in the way in which they influenced local and national public opinion and only a week ago, I was having a conversation with one of our political parties, explaining how Weblogs can be enlisted to help shape ideas and opinions in the run-up to a General Election.



Weblogs are the modern equivalent of Pirate Radio Stations in the sixties and seventies. Visit www.blogger.com the site now owned by Google and you’ll probably discover that the great majority of Weblogs offer little more than tedious adolescent emotional graffiti or the personal diaries of many thousands of Bridget Jones clones. Like tuning a radio, among the static, can be found commentaries that draw one’s attention and increasingly compete with mainstream news sites as sources of opinion and information.

What business and even politics in Britain hasn’t yet grasped is the “Samizdat” nature of Weblogging. Samizdat was a grassroots strategy to evade officially imposed censorship in the Soviet-bloc countries wherein people clandestinely printed and distributed government-suppressed literature or other media. The idea was that copies were made a few at a time, and anyone who had a copy and access to any sort of copying equipment was encouraged to make more copies.

A popular Weblog that focuses on an issue or a company can pull the carpet out from underneath the feet or authority and thanks to the power of search engines, such as Google, direct a consumer’s enquiry to the very website that a large company would rather they did not visit.

I’ll offer a small example. I run a modest little Weblog called ThanetLife.com which focuses on life around my local community in Kent. ThanetLife issues and stories based, not particularly profound but is generating growing traffic because it offers uncensored comment on local matters. In fact, it’s triggered two local radio interviews, an “almost” face-to-face” debate with the Prime Minister and the site log shows it has been “spidered” by the BBC.

Because it’s Web-based, the Weblog is more agile than the local papers and has limitless space. Already and with an election looming, local politicians have noticed its potential but local business and the local council haven’t yet come to terms with how the internet can act as a lens to polarise local issues in a way that local radio and local papers can’t.

Of course, “Dog of the Week” has been a huge success but so has comment on cancelled flights on EUJet, our local budget airline, in alight-hearted piece called “Where are the Fokkers?” The important point however, is that Weblogs offer people a voice and a publishing reach that simply wsn’t possible in the past. A negative review of comment in a popular Weblog can be almost as bad for a business as an opinion-former as any similar piece in a national newspaper.

At a time when democracy and the privileges given to us as a society in Magna Carta, are being steadily whittled away by the arrival of a Presidential-style of government, Weblogging here and even in countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia remind us that the Internet, for all its problems, can drive the principles of free-speech and democracy forward in a way that was impossible in the past. The Weblog is the man-in-the-street’s equivalent of an aircraft carrier and while the great majority float aimlessly in a sea comment, some can make a difference and keep big business and politics honest in a world which tends increasingly towards the opposite.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…