Skip to main content
Risky Business

It’s a thorny question and one that hasn’t yet been properly explored in Britain. Where does the ultimate responsibility lie in cases of online banking fraud?



An American businessman is reportedly suing Bank of America for the return of $90,000 he claims was stolen from his online banking account when he fell victim to a computer virus. For the technically-minded, this was Backdoor.Coreflood a Backdoor Trojan that is primarily designed to conduct Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. It connects to an IRC server and transfers control of the infected computer to an attacker, who was, in this case, apparently in Latvia. Apparently, $20,000 of the money was quickly withdrawn by the fraudulent recipient and the remainder was frozen by a local bank that was on the ball.

Mr Joseph Lopez, the unhappy customer – and who wouldn’t be – claims that his bank is responsible for the theft because it failed to properly protect him from known online banking risks and should have spotted such a large transfer winging its way towards a Bank in one of the newest EU members, without considering it might be dodgy. It is estimated that as much as one-third to half of all cybercrime now originate with organised crime gangs in Russia, Eastern Europe and the Baltic nations.

Mr Lopez claims that Bank of America was negligent in what will become a landmark case exploring the growing problem of online banking risk. It raises the question of whether financial institutions, can reasonably expect customers to protect themselves from the increasingly sophisticated threat of cybercrime

Central to his legal argument is that banks know only too well that online banking is risky and should be more proactive in defending their customers from online threats. Bank of America insists that it has in place "stringent" electronic security measures and continually monitors online banking for irregular activity.

From another perspective, the case appears to follow the well-trodden American “Poodle in the Microwave” argument. Mr Lopez, like millions of other people, may not have had an up-to-date antivirus program running on his Personal Computer, which, as a result, left him wide-open to hundreds if not thousands of potential threats from the Internet. By arguing that the fault lies with the bank and not him, he potentially challenges the concept of online banking in its present form as unworkable. After all, this is, in principle, a trusted conversation between two remote parties but one, is now insisting that security is not a shared responsibility where two connected systems are involved.

If the US courts were to rule in favour of Mr Lopez, then online banking may become untenable in the present atmosphere of Internet crime as banks would be forced to shoulder an unacceptable level of responsibility and risk in the provision of online services. The case also begs a second question. Let’s say for the sake of example, you’re buried behind a firewall, with the latest Norton Anti Virus 2005 and Spyware Blaster, all running and slowing your machine down to a crawl in the interests of personal security. What happens, if a new threat creeps through the firewall undetected, collects your keystrokes and rifles your bank account overnight. Who’s to blame for the hole? You, the bank or the antivirus vendor? The criminals are rarely caught leaving the rest of us to worry about the risks and whether in fact we should return to queuing a local branch of one’s bank, that’s if they existed anymore.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …