Skip to main content
The Bigger They Are

In a report on the National Programme for IT (NPfIT) published last month and entitled, “Computerising the Chinese Army, centre-right policy “Think-tank”, Aediles expressed concerns over the management and storage of confidential patient information across a fully joined-up Health Service. The report recommended that “The concept of the Data Spine should be reviewed” and in the context of National ID Card and NHS Proposals for "secure" central files, last week’s reported break-in at the prime contractor for secure US systems and a main contractor to our own Government, is significant.

"Nothing has been stolen I promise you"

On Saturday, the Washington Post revealed that Science Applications International, (SAIC) a $7 billion corporation which manages many of the United States government’s most sensitive information security contracts, had been compromised at the end of January, after a burglary “netted” computers containing the Social Security numbers, share-dealing histories and personal details of tens of thousands of past and present company employees.

SAIC’s directors, shareholders, employees and consultants include many of Washington's most influential figures and include former military and intelligence officials, with government security clearances and these have now been informed of the danger of identity theft as a result.

The SAIC break-in begs the question that if an international contractor of this size in a country where security guards are invariably armed, cannot secure its own systems then what faith can we have in the overall security of any large central database of sensitive information in the UK? It implies that any policy of our own in the UK must sensibly be built around the assumption that security can (and will) be broken rather than the present and rather touching faith in the technology that protects it.

In the present atmosphere, driven by the introduction of new compliance legislation, Government might be well-advised to look more closely at how the finance sector handles such risks in relation to both NHS records and National ID card Proposals.

Identity theft is a growing problem that now has the recognition it deserves as a target for organised crime. According to Gartner, more than 1.4 million American users have suffered from identity theft fraud, costing banks and card issuers £650m in direct losses in the past year and in the last two months two high-profile cases, the theft of AOL’s subscriber information and the case of expatriate Englishman, Philip Cummings, 35, who worked for New York Teledata Communications, a company that provides the software needed to run credit checks at America’s “big three” credit-history bureaux: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion.

Cummings sold passwords and credit information to a Nigerian gang, who used them to cheat about 30,000 people out of an estimated $50 million-$100 million. Facing fifty years in jail for fraud, he told the court:” I normally don’t get into this kind of trouble.”

The evidence to date on the overall effectiveness of information security against the risk of identity theft should be enough to disturb citizens and government. Shadow Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley, referring to the NPfIT, has commented that “Special safeguards for some means concern for others” and the SAIC burglary should serve as a wake-up call to politicians of all parties that the theft of a database holding sensitive personal information can be more attractive, lucrative and present less risk to criminals than robbing a large bank.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…