Skip to main content
The Bigger They Are

In a report on the National Programme for IT (NPfIT) published last month and entitled, “Computerising the Chinese Army, centre-right policy “Think-tank”, Aediles expressed concerns over the management and storage of confidential patient information across a fully joined-up Health Service. The report recommended that “The concept of the Data Spine should be reviewed” and in the context of National ID Card and NHS Proposals for "secure" central files, last week’s reported break-in at the prime contractor for secure US systems and a main contractor to our own Government, is significant.


"Nothing has been stolen I promise you"

On Saturday, the Washington Post revealed that Science Applications International, (SAIC) a $7 billion corporation which manages many of the United States government’s most sensitive information security contracts, had been compromised at the end of January, after a burglary “netted” computers containing the Social Security numbers, share-dealing histories and personal details of tens of thousands of past and present company employees.

SAIC’s directors, shareholders, employees and consultants include many of Washington's most influential figures and include former military and intelligence officials, with government security clearances and these have now been informed of the danger of identity theft as a result.

The SAIC break-in begs the question that if an international contractor of this size in a country where security guards are invariably armed, cannot secure its own systems then what faith can we have in the overall security of any large central database of sensitive information in the UK? It implies that any policy of our own in the UK must sensibly be built around the assumption that security can (and will) be broken rather than the present and rather touching faith in the technology that protects it.

In the present atmosphere, driven by the introduction of new compliance legislation, Government might be well-advised to look more closely at how the finance sector handles such risks in relation to both NHS records and National ID card Proposals.

Identity theft is a growing problem that now has the recognition it deserves as a target for organised crime. According to Gartner, more than 1.4 million American users have suffered from identity theft fraud, costing banks and card issuers £650m in direct losses in the past year and in the last two months two high-profile cases, the theft of AOL’s subscriber information and the case of expatriate Englishman, Philip Cummings, 35, who worked for New York Teledata Communications, a company that provides the software needed to run credit checks at America’s “big three” credit-history bureaux: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion.

Cummings sold passwords and credit information to a Nigerian gang, who used them to cheat about 30,000 people out of an estimated $50 million-$100 million. Facing fifty years in jail for fraud, he told the court:” I normally don’t get into this kind of trouble.”

The evidence to date on the overall effectiveness of information security against the risk of identity theft should be enough to disturb citizens and government. Shadow Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley, referring to the NPfIT, has commented that “Special safeguards for some means concern for others” and the SAIC burglary should serve as a wake-up call to politicians of all parties that the theft of a database holding sensitive personal information can be more attractive, lucrative and present less risk to criminals than robbing a large bank.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Matter of Drones - Simon Moores for The Guardian

I have a drone on my airfield” – a statement that welcomes passengers to the latest dimension in air-travel disruption. Words of despair from the chief operating officer of Gatwick airport in the busiest travel week of the year. Elsewhere, many thousands of stranded and inconvenienced passengers turned in frustration to social media in an expression of crowd-sourced outrage.

How could this happen? Why is it still happening over 12 hours after Gatwick’s runways were closed to aircraft, why is an intruder drone – or even two of them – suspended in the bright blue sky above the airport, apparently visible to security staff and police who remain quite unable to locate its source of radio control?

Meanwhile, the UK Civil Aviation Authority, overtaken by both the technology and events, is reduced to sending out desperate tweets warning that an airport incursion is a criminal offence and that drone users should follow their new code of conduct. Yet this is not an unforeseen event. It was i…
A Christmas Tale

It’s pitch blackness in places along the sea wall this evening and I'm momentarily startled by a small dog with orange flashing yuletide antlers along the way. I’m the only person crazy enough to be running and I know the route well enough to negotiate it in the dark, part of my Christmas exercise regime and a good way of relieving stress.

Why stress you might ask. After all, it is Christmas Day.

True but I’ve just spent over two hours assembling the giant Playmobil ‘Pony Farm’ set when most other fathers should be asleep in front of the television.



I was warned that the Playmobil ‘Pirate Ship’ had driven some fathers to drink or suicide and now I understand why. If your eyesight isn’t perfect or if you’ve had a few drinks with your Christmas lunch then it’s a challenge best left until Boxing day but not an option if you happen to have a nine year old daughter who wants it ready to take horses by tea time.

Perhaps I should stick to technology but then, the instruc…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…