Skip to main content
No Responsibility Only Quangos

Among the list of 168 “Quangos” that an incoming Conservative government has pledged to scrap, one in particular caught my attention, The Central Sponsor for Information Assurance (CSIA), which while helping to protect the country’s communications and IT infrastructure, the party claims, “overlaps the work of other bodies”, principally the NISCC, the National Infrastructure Coordination Centre, I assume. Posted by Hello

That Top-heavy Quango Feeling

The Conservatives have been relatively astute in spotting that the CSIA, a legacy of the now defunct Office of the e-Envoy and a department of The Cabinet Office appears to have achieved very little in its short history of alleged quangoid existence. Apparently, its role: “Provides a central focus for information assurance in promoting the understanding that it is essential for government and business alike to maintain reliable, secure and resilient national information systems.”

Given that the people of the United Kingdom now finds themselves mired down by the constant danger of attack and criminal activity from the Internet, spending ever more for protection from a bloated information security industry, it is reassuring to read that “The CSIA will encourage a 'culture of security' regarding information systems across central and local government, the private sector as well as to the general public.”

If this is a question of the “buck” stopping somewhere, then the responsibility for our present mess should rest firmly with the CSIA, which, according to its Website, is supposed to “Provide a strategic direction for Information Assurance (IA) across the whole of the UK.” If anyone happens to have been offered such direction in the last twelve months, then please raise your hand.

I’m sure the CSIA must have delivered something of tangible value to the taxpayer but this is possibly a secret and like the other Quangos identified by the Tories, which include The Commission for Integrated Transport. The Public Services Productivity Panel and The Standing Committee on Euro Preparations, achievements are supported by a considerable weight of expensive research.

From where I sit, there is very little evidence of a national strategy capable of addressing even a small part of the challenge we are now facing from the Internet. Instead of a fully joined-up response to the problem, we appear to be tackling the danger by committee or worse still, through convoluted efforts of The Cabinet Office.

In the United States last week, the Los Angeles Times reports that, “Both beginners and veterans are finding the Interweb experience so repellent that they're disconnecting in droves, blaming malware and spam. Despite an overall increase in numbers of humans connected to the internet, the mass turn-off is beginning to hit ecommerce in the United States.” In the same week, A British man who worked on a help-desk for a software company was been jailed for fourteen years for his part in the largest identity theft in history; stealing the identities of 30,000 Americans and netting $100 million dollars from rifled bank accounts for his Nigerian gang masters.

While most activities, legal and illegal are bigger and more ambitious on the opposite side of the Atlantic, they invariably have their imitators on these shores and the evidence of a single week’s press clipping in January 2005 tells us that someone needs to take charge in this country as a matter of urgency.

Should the CSIA be scrapped then? If it’s failing to deliver against its purpose, then possibly yes but given the enviable track record of indecision from of the present government, all we are then likely to be given in its place is yet another Quango to protect us from the darker side of the Internet.


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…