Skip to main content
Who Goes There

Regulatory compliance and what it's all about!

Historically, compliance is a noun with an unwelcome association with authority; as in “Compliance Officer” but for businesses, changes in regulations means that from now on, it will be tightly connected with the elimination of risk, adding to the burden that companies carry in a world now wrapped tightly in regulatory red-tape. Posted by Hello



In the shadow of a number of high-profile corporate scandals and the ever-present threat of cybercrime, understanding and controlling access to systems and data has become a driving force behind the introduction of a raft of new business regulations and many observers would agree that the American Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA), is the single most influential piece of legislation affecting corporate governance, financial disclosure and the practice of public accounting in the last seventy years.

Among other requirements, the Sarbanes Oxley Act calls for an annual assessment of internal controls relating to risk management and application access and one of the key issues behind the new Basel Capital Accord (Basel II) is operational supervision; ensuring that users aren’t able to access any applications that might lead to risk or compromise to the business. Several leading IT companies are now working on an industry initiative with a number of solutions providers needed to create a complete identity management solution to support the introduction of new compliance regulations for the financial services industry and this week, I’m invited to join a round-table on the subject in the City of London, organised by Microsoft and which includes Unisys, OpenNetwork, British Airways and PriceWaterhouseCoopers.

The argument in favour of stronger compliance or what is really sound identity management policy, says that however strong the foundation of any computing environment, the Operating System, it is worth very little without solutions that properly address authentication, authorisation, administration and a central store.

Inside this four-sided box; identity management is composed of three main components aimed at creating a unified single point of access to all applications within a company. These are user management, provisioning, access control, taking care of the user life-cycle and their authorisation profile and finally, automating the creation and management of user accounts into different back-end systems.

This might be the objective but the reality in most business sectors, is that people hold multiple identities and access rights to systems, some of which might be considered business critical and which are not controlled from a single point. In such a relaxed regime, an individual might have access to sensitive information and this was one potential scenario explored at the last eCrime Congress, which had a temporary member of staff, a skilled computer operator, infiltrated by an organised crime gang into a foreign bank, with the objective of stealing online account details, taking advantage of lax identity management policies. This is one reason why the highly regulated financial services industry in the UK is the one most sensitive to the risks and penalties of non-compliance and why it’s the market that’s adopting the technology the fastest.

Identity management is the message that like the words in a stick of rock, weaves it way through the new compliance and regulatory framework. It may not be as complex as you think it is but if you’re a company of any size, you need to think about the fact that your business platform has to provide a foundation for compliance in the future, regardless of what the regulations are calling for now and that means preparing for tomorrow by putting sound and flexible identity management policies in place today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…