Skip to main content
Sons and Lovers

“Then shall one speak of one who loved not wisely but too well.”

David Blunkett’s fall from grace has a Shakespearean familiarity. A plot with all the right ingredients of passion, power, betrayal and arrogance, for the television dramatisation that must inevitably follow, once the dust has had time to settle.



It is one of the greatest fallibilities of the human race, an intense love affair that is. To quote Shakespeare once again, “Tis a sickness and its cure together” and perhaps society should be a little more forgiving and less judgemental, treating such incidents as if the person involved was the victim of some sudden mental illness, which is what it is, simply ask Mark Anthony or Othello, Profumo or Blunkett.

Not so long ago, I watched a television documentary that tried very hard to understand the chemistry of romance from a scientific perspective. Most interesting was the evidence of brain changes when the subjects were scanned, with areas of the cortex visibly “Lit-up” like a Christmas tree in the subjects – or victims – of a passionate love affair. It might be argued that with the brain so disturbed by the experience that a person could not be considered completely responsible for their actions, an argument that leads directly to the judgement of crimes of passion, a temporary madness, that can lead a person to fast track a visa application against all common sense and at great risk to one’s career and marriage.

With Blunkett gone, there was a moment’s hope that the Home Office might fall under the control of someone with a little more imagination and intelligence than the tragic figure of the Prime Minister’s friend. Any hopes were quickly dashed by the appointment of the thuggish Cabinet enforcer, Charles Clark, a man with the charm and physique of the Vogon constructor fleet commander in Douglas Adam’s novel, the “Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” and from whom we can expect more of the same, fewer carrots and rather more stick.

A society elects the politicians it deserves and by any account the present Cabinet gives us very little to be proud of, a divided and squabbling executive, castigated by Blunkett’s recent biography and led by one who many regard as the most mistrusted and disingenuous Prime Ministers of the century.

My opinion, for what little it is worth, is that our society has lost any real sense of belief, in politicians, in religion and in our ability to make the world a better place. Government today resembles an executive trapped between a dependency culture and the socially unattractive pressures of a global economy. Decisions that shape the future of nations are made by multi-national businesses and banks and government has to act as a mediator between these powerful forces and it doesn’t do this well. I don’t pretend to offer any answers, only the belief that democracy is looking increasingly stale and tired and only the Shakespearian epic of the last week, make it faintly interesting to a bored and disillusioned population.

A final quote on the resignation of the fallen David Blunkett, this time not from Shakespeare but from Dickens: “Tis a far far better thing I do than I have ever done before

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…