Skip to main content
Stand and Deliver – Your Money or Your Life

It may have been simple coincidence, my letter from the Inland Revenue arriving within two days of my column, this month, where I wrote I wouldn’t trust them enough to file anything electronically, given the number of attempts that my accountant and I had made to send P11Ds to Edinburgh this year. Posted by Hello



The letter was one of the standard communications I have come to expect from this department of government these days. Simply stating that I had failed to supply them with my P11D returns for the tax year and that I was now to be fined £400 and deported.

Panic and a series of phone calls were predictable. Between us, my accountant and I estimated that we had posted or faxed at least six copies of the document to the Inspector and when I tried calling the Revenue, I was simply told they didn’t have them, so tough luck. My accountant had a somewhat better result. Yes they has found the P11Ds in question but they had so many copies they didn’t know which to input, so they didn’t or there was a “computer error” with the result that a fine had been issued, which I should now ignore.

What are the odds I wonder that in a couple of month’s time I will receive an even larger fine for not paying the first one? And of course, it’s all my fault not theirs.

In the light of the Commons Public Accounts Committee discussing giving the Revenue the power to recover tax debts directly from a person's salary or bank account, I’m deeply concerned that we have in place an overloaded, inefficient system which simply doesn’t work, leaving the Treasury with tax debts of £12bn, which it has no real chance of recovering and in many cases, with me as an example, are quite wrong and are executed with a breathtaking disregard for any sense of natural justice.

It’s all very well spending billions of taxpayers pounds on a computer system which can only lose data and send out fines but the Revenue now appear to be acting in the best example of Westminster Council traffic wardens in a kind of shoot first, ask questions later approach to tax collection.

When, I wonder, will we see any central government system that works in the best interest of the taxpayer? The acid remarks of the Public Accounts Committee are proof of this. What about Family Tax Credits, No. the National Assessment Agency, No. I’m racking my brains to find a single example of something really big in central government IT that works properly and efficiently, anything and I’m stuck, I can’t think of one.

Of course, next-up to bat are identity cards and I listened to the most specious drivel from Ministers on this subject following the Queen’s speech. The thin argument that “The public want them”, appears to be enough justification to spend even more billions of our national debt on another advanced project which is most unlikely to deliver the sweeping benefits that Government has in mind for identity management.

Still, when you’re fed-up with working for Tony on large scale IT triumphs you can always find a welcome in the private sector. Former e-Envoy Andrew Pinder has been appointed to the Board of Directors of Entrust, and Sir Peter Gershon, former Chief Executive of the Office of Government Commerce has also become an independent, non-executive chairman of Symbian. And so while the television series “Yes Minister” may have finished two decades ago, its spirit lives on at Westminster.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…