Skip to main content
Doublethink

“Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.” George Orwell - 1984


George Orwell

“Over four million cameras” said the American presenter, with visible emphasis. “Britain”, he said, “has become the world’s leading surveillance society and thanks to plans from our own Department of Homeland Security (DoHS) for the wider introduction of closed-circuit television in our cities, we’ll be catching up quickly.”

In fact, the Americans, with an invisible menace to fight, are taking surveillance technology to their hearts. The head of the Washington project states”I don’t think there’s really a limit on the feeds [the system] can take”. Further, he wants ‘to build…. the capability to tap into not only video but databases and systems across the region’, and eventually moving into any number of schools, businesses and neighbourhoods.”

A friend of mine, who used to wear a trench coat and carry a copy of the Financial Times, told me, in early in 2001, “You only need to start worrying about government when it really starts to join-up and there’s no real evidence that it will be able to achieve the levels of integration and departmental cooperation you’re worrying about for a long time to come.”

That was before 911 which gave impetus to the concept of ‘joined-up’ government and urgency that it never had before. In the United States in particular, the arrival of the DoHS has given carte blanche to the concept of inter-agency information sharing and the introduction of biometric passports and observers are concerned by the arrival of the “No-fly “database which will hold the names of all “known” and “suspected” terrorists. “

“What happens”, asked the TV presenter, “if someone with a grudge against you adds your name to that list? You’ll be hauled-off an aircraft wherever you happen to be and with no appeal”. He didn’t mention the recent example of singer Yusef Islam (AKA Cat Stevens), who was recently diverted on his flight to Washington and promptly deported for the possession of dubious musical talent but it illustrates the power of databases that governments on both sides of the Atlantic are busily compiling and sharing in their search for potential terrorists. For Americans in particular, there is now the added risk that the United States now offers no easy distinction between active "enemy combatants", material supporters and the much larger class of radical opponents of government policy

Twenty years later than George Orwell predicted we can thank David Blunkett and George Bush for introducing a raft of well-intentioned technological measures, ostensibly aimed at protecting national security and which instead of guaranteeing democratic freedoms continue to help erode them. “Men”, said George Orwell, “are only as good as their technical development allows them to be” and technology is a willing partner in fuelling society’s fear of the unknown. As 2005 approaches and illustrated by the contents of the Queen’s speech, we are allowing ourselves to be drawn into the 1984 world of ‘Doublethink’, twenty years later than predicted. Where Orwell wrote, “Big Brother is watching you”, we should be asking where the intrusive presence of technology can be halted and whether in fact we have surrendered any right to say “No” to its growing place in our lives?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…