Skip to main content
New World Maybe – Brave Certainly Not

In a matter of days, we’ll know who the next President of the United States will be in an election that may be decided, once again, by the same electoral technology that awarded the post to the present incumbent.



Like me, I’m sure you can remember what you were doing when the two aircraft slammed into the twin towers of the World Trade Centre. In the relatively short period of time between then and now, we’ve seen the world change and not for the better. At the forefront we have witnessed the introductions of technologies of control, permissions-based architectures which have supposed to have made our lives more secure and which in fact have bought us closer, inch by inch to the kind of world that George Orwell imagined in his book 1984.

Biometrics, digital rights management, spyware, speed cameras and even concrete barriers, are all contributing to a world where our activities are increasingly restricted or monitored, in an attempt to protect the state from purple powder, terrorism or liability or our employers from the equal risk of liability and litigation.

With so much expensive technology at our disposal, you might think that we could protect ourselves, have trains that ran on time and an education and health service that worked but we can’t. We spend more money, build bigger fences and watch helplessly as overall workforce productivity continues to decline.

Technology was also supposed to make us richer, more innovative and ultimately liberate us from the shackles of bureaucracy and inefficiency. In many ways it has but not without cost. The freedoms that computing and the Internet promised over the last twenty years now appear to be turning more rapidly towards the evolution of architecture of control, justified by paranoia and the threat of expensive litigation. A world dominated not by visionaries and reformists but the frequently narrow imaginations of politicians and lawyers attempting to maintain their authority and the status quo of dominant market positions and interests in the face of the threat of digital anarchy.

To illustrate this uncertain relationship with the Internet, take two quotes from leading UK companies, household brands, from a piece of yet unpublished research:

‘Most of my content sits behind a strong permissions based system. Control of content is everything.’

‘The Internet has changed the rules and few people understand this. There is little awareness at a political level of the gates of hell opening up.’

I’m a technologist, whose interests and projects overlap with civil society, crime and the public sector. My own big picture view of what is happening here, in Europe and elsewhere is that of bureaucracy, business and the state, attempting to re-establish control of a world that slipped from their grasp in 2000, in a technology arms race that will ultimately lock all of us down behind a creeping and insidious barrier of digital permissions in the interests of security and economic well-being.

What we can be sure of is that the results of elections on both sides of the Atlantic will determine whether I’m a paranoid liberal or whether I’ll soon be living a pay per view existence in a world where the trains might run on time.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Matter of Drones - Simon Moores for The Guardian

I have a drone on my airfield” – a statement that welcomes passengers to the latest dimension in air-travel disruption. Words of despair from the chief operating officer of Gatwick airport in the busiest travel week of the year. Elsewhere, many thousands of stranded and inconvenienced passengers turned in frustration to social media in an expression of crowd-sourced outrage.

How could this happen? Why is it still happening over 12 hours after Gatwick’s runways were closed to aircraft, why is an intruder drone – or even two of them – suspended in the bright blue sky above the airport, apparently visible to security staff and police who remain quite unable to locate its source of radio control?

Meanwhile, the UK Civil Aviation Authority, overtaken by both the technology and events, is reduced to sending out desperate tweets warning that an airport incursion is a criminal offence and that drone users should follow their new code of conduct. Yet this is not an unforeseen event. It was i…
A Christmas Tale

It’s pitch blackness in places along the sea wall this evening and I'm momentarily startled by a small dog with orange flashing yuletide antlers along the way. I’m the only person crazy enough to be running and I know the route well enough to negotiate it in the dark, part of my Christmas exercise regime and a good way of relieving stress.

Why stress you might ask. After all, it is Christmas Day.

True but I’ve just spent over two hours assembling the giant Playmobil ‘Pony Farm’ set when most other fathers should be asleep in front of the television.



I was warned that the Playmobil ‘Pirate Ship’ had driven some fathers to drink or suicide and now I understand why. If your eyesight isn’t perfect or if you’ve had a few drinks with your Christmas lunch then it’s a challenge best left until Boxing day but not an option if you happen to have a nine year old daughter who wants it ready to take horses by tea time.

Perhaps I should stick to technology but then, the instruc…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…