Skip to main content
New World Maybe – Brave Certainly Not

In a matter of days, we’ll know who the next President of the United States will be in an election that may be decided, once again, by the same electoral technology that awarded the post to the present incumbent.



Like me, I’m sure you can remember what you were doing when the two aircraft slammed into the twin towers of the World Trade Centre. In the relatively short period of time between then and now, we’ve seen the world change and not for the better. At the forefront we have witnessed the introductions of technologies of control, permissions-based architectures which have supposed to have made our lives more secure and which in fact have bought us closer, inch by inch to the kind of world that George Orwell imagined in his book 1984.

Biometrics, digital rights management, spyware, speed cameras and even concrete barriers, are all contributing to a world where our activities are increasingly restricted or monitored, in an attempt to protect the state from purple powder, terrorism or liability or our employers from the equal risk of liability and litigation.

With so much expensive technology at our disposal, you might think that we could protect ourselves, have trains that ran on time and an education and health service that worked but we can’t. We spend more money, build bigger fences and watch helplessly as overall workforce productivity continues to decline.

Technology was also supposed to make us richer, more innovative and ultimately liberate us from the shackles of bureaucracy and inefficiency. In many ways it has but not without cost. The freedoms that computing and the Internet promised over the last twenty years now appear to be turning more rapidly towards the evolution of architecture of control, justified by paranoia and the threat of expensive litigation. A world dominated not by visionaries and reformists but the frequently narrow imaginations of politicians and lawyers attempting to maintain their authority and the status quo of dominant market positions and interests in the face of the threat of digital anarchy.

To illustrate this uncertain relationship with the Internet, take two quotes from leading UK companies, household brands, from a piece of yet unpublished research:

‘Most of my content sits behind a strong permissions based system. Control of content is everything.’

‘The Internet has changed the rules and few people understand this. There is little awareness at a political level of the gates of hell opening up.’

I’m a technologist, whose interests and projects overlap with civil society, crime and the public sector. My own big picture view of what is happening here, in Europe and elsewhere is that of bureaucracy, business and the state, attempting to re-establish control of a world that slipped from their grasp in 2000, in a technology arms race that will ultimately lock all of us down behind a creeping and insidious barrier of digital permissions in the interests of security and economic well-being.

What we can be sure of is that the results of elections on both sides of the Atlantic will determine whether I’m a paranoid liberal or whether I’ll soon be living a pay per view existence in a world where the trains might run on time.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …