Skip to main content
No Questions Asked

Of late, I’ve been writing about identity, what it is, what it’s not and why even the promise of identity cards, biometric or otherwise may prove only that you are what a series of easily forged documents say you are and if you happen to find yourself on the FBI’s most wanted terrorist list because some muddled typist in an outsourced data-processing operation, two continents away, can’t spell your middle name, before entering it into the passport database, then tough luck.




The fight against money laundering has assumed the properties of farce and has, as a consequence, allowed a series of dangerously intrusive measures to enter our lives through the back door of regulatory expedience. This summer has seen me compelled to present my nine-year old daughter, in person, to the Halifax Bank, to “prove” that she is the owner of her savings account and almost two months of paperwork, attempting to open a Building Society account for subscriptions to The Conservative Technology Forum.

First prize however goes not to a bank or a building society but to the travel agents, Thomas Cook.

Last week, I visited the Bureau de Change at the company and asked for the enormous sum of fifty pounds, in Euros, on my bank debit card. “No problem Sir”, I was told, “Can I see your driving licence please, one with a photo on it?” This was duly presented and the girl typed the details into her PC. “And your bank card please.” More typing. “And finally your postcode please.” I gave here this as well and it was swiftly looked-up on her system. “Which house number please?” “Number two, I replied”, which was followed by a final burst of typing.

Do you really need to record all of this information on your system” I asked the cashier. “It’s the rules”, she replied, handing me my fifty Euros in a plastic envelope.

In a world faced by the increasing risk of identity theft, I had given Thomas Cook three of my most critical personal details in exchange for fifty euros. At the Post Office, they’ll give you Euros if you simply show them a form of identity to support your credit card and at Tesco, you’ll get cash back without any identity check at all, so why does Thomas Cook need to store this personal information?

I called the company’s press office and they emailed me a statement by return.

“Because in effect you were obtaining cash on your debit card, your card company requires Thomas Cook to obtain certain personal details for identification purposes, to ensure that the person presenting the card is the cardholder.”

“Thomas Cook Retail Limited is registered to process customer data for a number of reasons. The information we took from you is kept securely and is not divulged to any third party. The only time this sort of information would be used is if a cardholder subsequently contacted their card company to allege that their card had been used fraudulently. We would then need to prove to the card company that we had followed their procedures at the time of the transaction and had taken sufficient care to check the identity of the person who presented the card to us.”

Now I understand what they are telling me but I don’t believe that holding such data is necessary or proportionate and I then sought the advice of both Philip Virgo, Secretary General of Eurim and another leading expert on privacy in a digital society, Caspar Bowden, Microsoft’s Chief Privacy Advisor for Europe.

Virgo is worried that such examples of invasion of privacy mandated by UK Anti-Terrorism (money laundering) practice will, within a short period of time cease to become open to interpretation and will become embedded as part of the regulatory scenery, as government points to such practise as being in common use within the financial services industry. Ironically, Bowden presents Microsoft as a company concerned by the risks posed by the kind of information harvesting I’m describing, when he says, “The routine collection of identifiers and authenticators which increasingly are collected by organisations to audit and verify transactions can pose a serious risk of identity theft. Strict access controls and policy enforcement are necessary to ensure that such information will not leak out, through such means as social engineering attacks on authorised insiders.”

In the space of twelve months, many of us with bank or building society accounts, PEPS and pensions, have found ourselves coerced into surrendering personal information or having to complete customer validation, which can be simple or extraordinarily complex in the personal information they require. There appears to be no consistency in the level of detail demanded but should you, like me, attempt to challenge such a request, as I did with my own building society, you’ll find your account frozen until you comply with their demands.

Alternatively, as a policeman friend told me recently, “If you don’t want any fuss, simply open a National Savings Account or buy an English football club. No questions asked.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…