Skip to main content
If at First you Don't Succeed, Try Management

People don't make the same mistake twice; they frequently make it three, four or five times.

News that Microsoft will be wrapping a competitive advantage label around its Trustworthy Computing strategy, rather took me by surprise this week. After all, claiming to have a competitive advantage in the information security space normally implies that one has several volumes of supporting evidence, errr, rather like demonstrating that Internet Explorer is as solid as the rock of Gibraltar, when of course we know that the company’s efforts to fix this month’s latest ‘serious’ vulnerability has revealed a second equally dangerous weakness, on fully patched copies of Windows.



In fact, Netcraft report that more than one hundred Web servers are still distributing the "Scob" malicious code, first identified two weeks ago as code used in a widespread attack to plant Trojan horse programs on vulnerable computers. That attack used compromised Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) Web servers to distribute the Trojan horse programs

From Microsoft’s perspective, no matter how much you do, you never do enough and as hard as it tries to lock-down its products, it seems quite unable to keep pace with the number of new exploits that appear on an almost weekly basis.

Newer products, such as Windows Server 2003 have a pretty solid reputation by now and in that respect, the competitive advantage claim holds water but as one police officer pointed out to me in a conversation last week, at last, we have reached the point where Windows NT offers a pretty secure and reliable environment and perhaps we need to accept that product cycles need to be much slower than the vendors would wish them to be; driven as they are by Wall Street and their shareholders.

On a personal note and given a consistent series of delays and broken promises, I believe the last thing Steve Ballmer should be doing at present is declare that Microsoft is in a better position than its rivals in offering a jaded audience secure, trustworthy and above all confident computing. After all, I haven’t even received Service Pack 2 for Windows XP yet and when I do, I’m dreading the installation process for fear of something breaking my laptop and leaving me paralysed until I identify the problem. Rumours of backward compatibility “issues” have given me the jitters and most of us have experienced the risks involved in applying Service Packs in the past.

A wise man once said that “All things are possible except skiing through a revolving door” but perhaps he hadn’t thought too deeply over combining ‘Windows’, ‘competitive advantage’ and ‘security’ in a plausible and convincing sentence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…