Skip to main content
Microsoft and the Antivirus Question

Several people have asked about Microsoft possibly developing antivirus products, following comments made yesterday by Mike Nash, Security Business Unit vice president.



That Microsoft would be eyeing the antivirus market is not surprising. How slowly the company is moving in that direction is what people should find surprising. Consider that Microsoft agreed to acquire antivirus maker GeCad a year ago last week or that the company tested security software PC Satisfaction for the better part of a year.


One place antivirus software might make sense is part of the operating system. One of Microsoft's longstanding problems is figuring out when a separate product is utility enough to be made part of Windows. I can remember when companies charged for TCP/IP stacks. Microsoft eventually rolled that functionality into Windows, because networking had reached a certain critical mass.


But, the post-trial Microsoft must contend with the reality that operating system bundling is viewed more critically than even three or four years ago. I recall the mid-2001 fuss over Microsoft putting firewall capabilities into Windows XP. Firewall providers survived the bundling. Aside: JupiterResearch consumer surveys show that a large number of Windows XP users don't realize a firewall is built in to the operating system.


Bundling antivirus software into Windows could affect loyal Microsoft partners and increase unwanted criticism. Loyalty does count for something at Microsoft, which typically does stand by its loyal customers, although it sometimes steps on them accidentally (What happens when you're a mouse and an elephant rolls over in its sleep?).


News reports offered conflicting versions of Mr. Nash's comments, some suggesting Microsoft would release antivirus software and others that the company had undefined plans with respect to antivirus.


I don't envy Microsoft's position. The right thing to do for its customers would be to bundle antivirus software into Windows. The Internet is increasingly dangerous, and the company has an obligation to protect its Windows customers. But vendors like McAfee and Symantec are customers, too, and loyal partners--companies that have built up businesses around selling antivirus software subscriptions.


At some point, Microsoft will have to make the tough decision. Windows Service Pack 2 was a tough decision, because of the resource investment and potential customer usability impact. Bundling is another, and one I would encourage Microsoft to consider making. Soon. Whether intended or not, Mr. Nash's comments are now a trial balloon that Microsoft can use to gauge customer, partner, news media reaction to a move into the antivirus market. [via Microsoft Monitor]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…
A Christmas Tale

It’s pitch blackness in places along the sea wall this evening and I'm momentarily startled by a small dog with orange flashing yuletide antlers along the way. I’m the only person crazy enough to be running and I know the route well enough to negotiate it in the dark, part of my Christmas exercise regime and a good way of relieving stress.

Why stress you might ask. After all, it is Christmas Day.

True but I’ve just spent over two hours assembling the giant Playmobil ‘Pony Farm’ set when most other fathers should be asleep in front of the television.



I was warned that the Playmobil ‘Pirate Ship’ had driven some fathers to drink or suicide and now I understand why. If your eyesight isn’t perfect or if you’ve had a few drinks with your Christmas lunch then it’s a challenge best left until Boxing day but not an option if you happen to have a nine year old daughter who wants it ready to take horses by tea time.

Perhaps I should stick to technology but then, the instruc…