Skip to main content
Loosely Based

Loosely-based upon the Iliad of Homer. I watched Troy last night and it was very entertaining, holding in common some of the events and many of the characters of Homer’s epic story. That’s where it stopped though. Hollywood had its way and we lost both of history’s great Kings to the screenplay, Menelaus and Agamemnon, as well the Trojan King, Priam. We did have a wooden horse though and Brad Pitt, as Achilles, put in a good performance as the tortured psychotic hero before dying valiantly at the sack of Troy over the body of King Agamemnon, who Homer had stabbed in his bath back home in Greece but why spoil a good ending with Paris and the Beautiful Helen fleeing to live happily ever after.



I wonder if the film industry a thousand years from now will re-write the Second World War to have Churchill in a love affair with Eva Braun?

Troy follows the classic ‘All for Love’ formula, except that while Homer had the lovely Helen and Achilles’ warrior boyfriend, Patrocolus as the gay love interest, modern political correctness had the latter as good mate, which should see them protesting in the streets of San Francisco.

So, Helen of Troy, Anthony and Cleopatra or Captain Corelli, the message is the same. A passionate love affair can land you in serious trouble but as Shakespeare writes, ‘Tis a sickness and it’s cure together’ and the rational mind flies out of the window and before you know it, a thousand heavily armed Greek ships hove into view carrying an angry husband, bent on revenge with them.

One final point though. The special effects are now so good that the line between the audience watching the gladiatorial games in the arena two thousand years ago and mortal combat between Achilles and Hector in the comfort of a cinema seat, is very thin. The difference of course is that in the films the actors don’t really die but perhaps if they did, the audience might still be happily munching popcorn in the stalls, drawn to the primeval thrill of watching two men fight to the death?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…