Skip to main content
The Dream Gadgets of 2014 They're as small as your cell phone, more powerful than your desktop and packed with 10 years of future tech. Five design giants build the supergadgets of the future, from Wired magazine.

Milestones in communication, space exploration, entertainment, transportation, and medicine.

2006: Samsung releases a smartphone as thin and light as a credit card, thanks to advanced hard drives and processors the size of postage stamps.
2006: TV viewers opt out: A quarter of US households have a digital video recorder and choose to watch 15 percent fewer ads.
2007: As HD-DVDs hit the market, Blu-ray compression technology means more bits per disc. Forget bulky box sets
2008: It's a wireless world: More than 700 million users are plugged into Wi-Fi worldwide, a sevenfold increase in less than four years.
2008: Stanford scientists begin untying knotted proteins and finding cures for everything from Alzheimer's to Huntington's disease.
2009: Alzheimer's vaccine passes Viagra on all-time top-drugs list
2009: Sony and Hitachi team up to unveil 3-D holographic gaming systems.
2009: Digital identity cards are issued to all citizens - not as an antiterrorism measure
but to fight spam. Email not linked to an ID is universally ignored.
2010: Home stem cell cardiac treatment kits on sale.
2010: Legitimate online music retailers are responsible for half of all music sales.
2011: On-demand music, movies, and television programming make cable and broadcast networks obsolete.
2011: Number of global AIDS cases declines for first time.
2011: Downloading a DVD-quality feature film takes only five seconds.
2012: Cars are officially smarter than people: XML programming lets a BMW call a mechanic and explain what's wrong when it malfunctions.
2014: Paper 2.0: Organic LED screens become cheap and available, replacing traditional magazines and tourist maps.

[via Wired News]


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…