Skip to main content
Will Bill?

I had expected the message to appear from a burning bush or even one or two tablets of stone but in fact, Bill Gates ‘Security Progress Report” was almost lost when my Outlook client decided to treat it as ‘dodgy’ and file it under deleted mail.



Bill’s message presses all the right buttons. Microsoft is doing better, trying harder and is ever so more humble than at any time in its history. It’s investing zillions in remediating its software and is supporting any initiative which encourages business and the public to avoid the danger of digitally communicated diseases.

So why are we still in a mess?

Consultancy mi2G tell us that in the first quarter of 2004, the economic damage from malware - virus, worm and Trojan - proliferation alone reached an all time high of between $122bn and $150bn worldwide, dwarfing the impact from malware throughout 2003, when the damage was estimated to have been between $82bn and $100bn worldwide.

Where mi2G gets its figures from is a constant mystery to me and many others but we can all agree that that the last twelve months have been expensive and that Microsoft is seen to carry much if not most of responsibility for the problem.

This isn’t always fair because in a number of areas such as social engineering attacks, such as MyDoom, people, still open suspicious attachments and believe that a 1999 copy of Norton anti-virus will keep them safe from the latest threats.

Bill Gates writes bravely of the future and downstream Microsoft technologies which demand “fundamentally new thinking about software quality, continuous improvement in tools and processes”. However, the basics need to be sorted out before we start star gazing into the future. As an example, I have a wireless network at home and I can't get WEP encryption to work properly on Windows XP, which should be seamless. As I take the train to London with my wireless card plugged into my laptop, other people's networks pop up as I pass through the towns.

Unless Microsoft quickly and creatively sorts out the runaway consumer and SMB security problem, it runs the risk of a catastrophic loss of public confidence when the next big virus or worm comes along. Government is fed-up and so is big business and what we need are immediate solutions to today’s problems and we’ll worry about Microsoft’s next generation of products at a later date.

Meanwhile, the information security industry and Microsoft’s part in it, will continue to draw parallels with of Monty Python's ‘Life of Brian’. “What have Microsoft ever done for us?"

"Aqueducts"?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…