Skip to main content
When Fewer Security Alerts are More

Yesterday, Microsoft issued four security alerts that extend a strategy adopted about a year ago that I assume is designed to diminish the apparent number of vulnerabilities. Microsoft started consolidating related, multiple security vulnerabilities into single bulletins, rather than issuing separate warnings.


The four new alerts--three of which rank highest rating of "critical"--consolidate a hefty number of vulnerabilities into a much smaller number of alerts. Critical alert MS04-011 covers 11 separate vulnerabilities, while MS04-012 adds another four. That works out to 15 separate vulnerabilities, but only two alerts issued.


I view the consolidation tactic as part of what I call Microsoft's "security by PR," meaning public relations, strategy. Certainly, Microsoft should be commended for warning customers of vulnerabilities and issuing the appropriate patches. But, I don't think customers' best interests, or even Microsoft's, are served by apparently diminishing the overall security problem.


Right now, Microsoft is conducting a road show that is bringing major executives out to talk straight about security. If customers are going to trust in Microsoft security, they may want to feel they can trust what Microsoft tells them about security. I understand that issuing 17 alerts, as opposed to four, makes it harder for Microsoft executive to count up the number of alerts as use the counting and evidence security is improving. I would recommend an approach of winning real trust, which starts by being as upfront as possible to the extent of any problems.[via Microsoft Monitor]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …