Skip to main content
When Fewer Security Alerts are More

Yesterday, Microsoft issued four security alerts that extend a strategy adopted about a year ago that I assume is designed to diminish the apparent number of vulnerabilities. Microsoft started consolidating related, multiple security vulnerabilities into single bulletins, rather than issuing separate warnings.


The four new alerts--three of which rank highest rating of "critical"--consolidate a hefty number of vulnerabilities into a much smaller number of alerts. Critical alert MS04-011 covers 11 separate vulnerabilities, while MS04-012 adds another four. That works out to 15 separate vulnerabilities, but only two alerts issued.


I view the consolidation tactic as part of what I call Microsoft's "security by PR," meaning public relations, strategy. Certainly, Microsoft should be commended for warning customers of vulnerabilities and issuing the appropriate patches. But, I don't think customers' best interests, or even Microsoft's, are served by apparently diminishing the overall security problem.


Right now, Microsoft is conducting a road show that is bringing major executives out to talk straight about security. If customers are going to trust in Microsoft security, they may want to feel they can trust what Microsoft tells them about security. I understand that issuing 17 alerts, as opposed to four, makes it harder for Microsoft executive to count up the number of alerts as use the counting and evidence security is improving. I would recommend an approach of winning real trust, which starts by being as upfront as possible to the extent of any problems.[via Microsoft Monitor]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…