Skip to main content
The Sun Set(tles)

As I blogged before (here and here), Microsoft is dead serious about settling every lawsuit possible. Today?s settlement with Sun is perhaps the best example to date, as the two companies are bitter rivals and have locked horns during several knockdown legal scuffles.

The settlement solves several problems for Microsoft, while creating new opportunities. In a nutshell:

* Elimination of another potentially high-profile court case and the digging up of past behavior Microsoft is trying to forget and transcend. Consider the headlines the consumer case in Minnesota has been getting. Microsoft had good reasons to avoid going to going to court against Sun. Guilt or innocence isn?t the issue so much as perception.

* Rebuttal to last week?s negative antitrust ruling in Europe. Sun lobbied the European Union to open the investigation against Microsoft. Remember, that Sun makes server software that competes against Windows Server and must connect to Windows desktops. Now, Sun has access to broader Windows information and an agreement that would extend to other server software. My question: Will Sun now rally on Microsoft?s behalf in Europe?

* Validation of the server-licensing program. Twice, U.S. trustbusters have raised concerns the communications protocol licensing program has turned out to be an ineffective tool. Initially considered one of the most important areas of the U.S. antitrust settlement, the program has drawn little interest; some parties claim because Microsoft made some terms onerous. As part of the settlement, Sun has agreed to join the program, giving Microsoft a fairly high-profile licensee, as much because of the longstanding rivalry between the companies.

* Stronger foothold in the enterprise. Microsoft desperately wants to increase server software sales in the enterprise, where Unix operating systems, such as Sun?s Solaris, have longstanding footholds. The technology-sharing agreement increases the likelihood of better interoperability between Sun and Microsoft server software. According to Jupiter Research surveys, interoperability is the top priority of IT decision makers developing in-house applications. The largest businesses are most likely to be heterogeneous and so to run more than one type of server software, such as Solaris and Windows.

* Java lifeline to customers. The extension of the Java licensing agreement means that customers using software requiring Microsoft?s Java Virtual Machine won?t have to immediately rush and develop or buy a replacement. I think Microsoft would have benefited from a settlement where the company agreed to carry Sun?s JVM in Windows for, say, five years. Microsoft could have gained good public relations benefit from the move and better served its development partners and customers.

* Create new opportunities for .NET. By agreeing to work with Sun on Java--and visa versa on .NET--Microsoft has reach a potentially beneficial détente with its rival. Developers generally fall into three camps: Those developing using Java; those around .NET; and others doing both. The technology agreement could lead to better interoperability between the development/Web services platforms, which would be to Microsoft?s long-term advantage. If there is one thing Microsoft historically has done well is create development tools that are either easier to use or save time--or both. [via Microsoft Monitor]


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …