Skip to main content
The Counting Problem

Today, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates sent out an e-mail (here) about the company's progress improving security. At first I did a double-take and checked to make sure it wasn't April Fools Day, as opposed to March 31. That's because Mr. Gates and I must have a different way of counting.


He said that Microsoft issued nine "critical" or "important" security alerts for Windows Server 2003 compared to 40 for Windows 2000 Server, during both products' first 320 days of release. For starters, I'd like to know if Mr. Gates counted "Moderate" or "Low" alerts, seeing as how Microsoft changed how it rates security problems in-between product releases.


How funny: Last month, I went out and counted the number of Windows Server 2003 security alerts issued since the product shipped in April 2003 (see blog here). I found 15--more than 20 when figuring in products like Internet Explorer that are integrated into Windows Server 2003.


I figure where there is one counting disagreement, there might be another. So, this evening, I went back and counted up those Windows 2000 Server security alerts. I came up with 28 during the same span of time I got 15 for Windows Server 2003. Windows 2000 Server reached 15 alerts seven months after launch. The list of alerts is available here.


Certainly my different counting than Mr. Gates shows fewer alerts for Windows Server 2003 compared to Windows 2000 Server during the first 11 months following release. My point is one of credibility--and that's something Microsoft could use a little more of right now. In a Jupiter Research report soon to publish on Microsoft security, a mere 36 percent of IT managers from businesses with revenue of $50 million or more acknowledged that Microsoft product security had improved.


[via Microsoft Monitor]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …