Skip to main content
All About Me

With national identity cards only a matter of time, I’m confused and not really certain who I am anymore, so perhaps the arrival of a piece of plastic displaying my photo and thumb-print will clear up any doubt that I am, after all who I think I am and not who the Government thinks I am?



In the IT industry, we very much think of identity in terms of authentication and authorisation. Are you acting as an individual or as an employee of someone else? Are you a citizen of the UK or are you a member of a specific group or organisation?

Once this has been established in a rather arbitrary manner, then we need to be authorized, as in holding a driving license or having the right to enter certain buildings, access systems and networks and sign or authorize documents, payments, tax returns and all the other pieces of red tape that define modern existence.

Increasingly then, identity management is used to streamline and eliminate business processes and is integrating the individual into the legal and regulatory processes of society. In places like Kuwait and Bahrain, this is taken for granted, as the citizen ID card defines one’s place and privileges in a way that might send shudders down the spine of privacy groups in Europe. In the smaller, technologically advanced middle-eastern countries of the Gulf coast, a grand experiment has been taking place and they are really rather proud of the results as part of their push towards their own flavour of eGovernment, which is not quite the same as our own.

Back in the West, many of us outside the Home Office are still agonising over a large number of overlapping initiatives, public and private, local, regional, central and international. Parliamentary group, EURIM argues that in the UK, the key difference appears to be between private sector models, where the consent of the individual is paramount, and public sector models, where there is currently little or no consent. Instead the sharing of data collected under statutory (or other) powers is commonly banned unless explicitly permitted.

While the issues of personal identity are central to the growth of e-commerce, the modernisation of government and the fight against computer assisted crime. EURIM argues there is also much confusion as to which of these are intended to be linked and, if so, how. Objectives, priorities and timescales, let alone funding, legal frameworks and target audiences vary.

At the same time, Identrus points to the implications of identity theft, which has grown more than 60% since 2001 and is expected to cost businesses, governments and individuals $more than $300 billion this year.

Who, asks Identrus, will vouch for you? In terms of authentication, what proof will establish that you are who you say you are? Who will store and safeguard your information and how will it be transferred into a mobile mechanism?

And when it comes to authorisation, how disputes will be resolved, will it be legally binding and what liability coverage will be provided at a time when, in The United States, people have had to declare themselves legally dead because someone else has stolen their identity and the other person has outstanding warrants for their arrest.

I’m not convinced about ID cards but I don’t have a solution either. If North African terrorists can make it into the UK on the basis of a forged French ID card and we’re swamped with one-legged Romanian roofers looking for work, I’m rather wondering why we’re bothering.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…