Skip to main content
The Longer Road to Longhorn

According to numerous news stories, yesterday, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates off-handedly said that probably true is speculation Longhorn wouldn't ship until 2006. I can't say that I'm surprised. In the summer 2003 report, "Longhorn: Implications of the Next Windows' Ship Date," I pegged 2006 as Longhorn's likely release date.

Circumstances since lead me to question whether Longhorn's delivery might be later. As I blogged previously, release delays for "Whidbey" (Visual Studio .Net 2005) and "Yukon" (SQL Server 2005) jeopardized Microsoft's internal release schedule for Longhorn. I also see Windows XP Service Pack 2 compatibility issues and plans for Windows Server 2003 R2 as other indicators Longhorn's delivery would push out further.

Now weigh in those news stories, where Mr. Gates reportedly said that an "alpha" Longhorn version would ship later this year. In October, Microsoft had said the first Longhorn beta would ship in summer 2004. Assuming the alpha does ship by year's end, which would make sense given the Whidbey and Yukon delays, a solid beta might not come for another year. If that were the case, meaningful 2006 release--meaning widespread availability--would be a difficult target for Microsoft to hit.

Four of my reports are required reading for anyone trying to make sense out of Longhorn's delivery delays: The aforementioned one on Longhorn, "Service Pack 2: Microsoft Fortifies Windows XP," and two soon-to-publish on Windows fragmentation and Microsoft security. [via Microsoft Monitor]


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…