Skip to main content
No Callers Please

The efficiency of any technology or service is, I believe, inversely proportional to the size of the investment in the call-centre or the chief executive’s salary.

That’s my theory at least in a world where responsibility for such vague outdated abstracts as customer service, are increasingly passed to pre-recorded messages or outsourced to one of the new silicon sweat-shops in Mumbai.

This morning, a pre-recorded message at the station is apologising for the delay to a train, due to arrive one day soon on platform two and the BBC tells me that computers are much better at sending ‘spicy’ SMS messages than people; effectively passing the famous ‘Turing Test’ and leaving me to wonder why anyone would wish to spend fifty pence a message flirting with Jordan, a large dual processor unit on one of the domestic cellular networks.

Last week, as I stood outside an office block in Kent, I realised I was early and so, I called 118500 for the business’s number. “We have no record of that company”, the operator told me. “But I’m outside the building”, I said. “I’m reading from the sign”. “I’m sorry sir, there’s nothing listed”.

Ironically, this didn’t surprise me. Last summer, I conducted research into the business impact of directory services deregulation. At the time, 118500 were quite unable to find Price Waterhouse Coopers in London. Wearily, I tried another 118 service, another forty pence plus mobile connection charges and the telephone number I was searching for was returned in seconds, confirming that directory enquiries has become an expensive lottery where considerable effort is devoted to giving native Indian operators convincing Geordie accents. Telephone numbers come second.

Thousands of people, I’m assured, are now ‘Coming back to BT’. Wonderful news I’m sure but why did they desert the company in the first place and indeed having left, what kind of appalling service level experience elsewhere convinced them to return? It’s much the same perhaps with electricity or gas although it’s increasingly hard to determine which is which unless you use a match.

In pursuing technology-driven solutions to CRM and overall customer service, society appears to have lost track of its original purpose. Most recently, unable to get through to electronic superstore, Comet’s customer service, I tried calling the Chief Executive’s office several times to complain and on each occasion I was transferred back to the same unavailable customer service line to deal with my complaint.

Most of us have had similar experiences and the larger the business, the more likely it is that any attempt to connect with any other service except sales and new business will shunt you into some pre-recorded backwater with no means of returning to the unhelpful automated switchboard options, which all rather explains why more and more people are using the Internet, only to discover that the quality of customer service on offer there, can be worse than what we have come to expect from a call centre.

Finally, a technology services offshoot of the company that manages our domestic railway infrastructure proudly demonstrated a new voice automated system to me recently. Written by their offshore software development team, they believe it’s head and shoulders above anything else on the market. Like the famous Turing test, I found the conversation with the computer to be seamless and in fact, I couldn’t tell that I was talking to a machine which was obligingly tracking a parcel for me.

Just imagine then, a future, where like those saucy SMS messages, every unhappy customer call will be answered in three rings and dealt with, using the appropriate level of sympathy and a flawless regional accent. There may be absolutely no connection with any system capable of processing a complaint to any sensible conclusion but at least it will create the illusion that large businesses have an interest in keeping their customers happy in a world where many companies demonstrably use the technology of the call centre or the Internet as a barrier to keep them at arm’s length.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …