Skip to main content
The Future of Ideas

I’m depressed. I have been reading Lawrence Lessig’s ‘ The Future of Ideas’, his sequel to ‘Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace’ and it seems much of what he predicted and warned against at the start of the Internet revolution is slowly coming to pass, regardless of the march of Open Source computing.

Lessig, who I met at Cambridge in the summer of 2000, argued in his first book, that the common belief that cyberspace could not be regulated, “That it is, in its very essence, immune from government’s or anyone else’s control”, was a fallacy. His thesis was that “cyberspace has no nature”, it has only code which can on the one hand, create a free environment and on the other a place of “Exquisitely oppressive control”.

In ‘Code’, written in the heady days before the Internet bubble burst, he warned that we would have to choose what kind of Internet we wanted and what freedoms we will guarantee. These choices he wrote are all about architecture and the code that will eventually govern the world of the Internet and who will control it and for what purposes?

Four years on and Lessig is back. He argues that free resources are crucial to innovation and creativity but that the revolution that produced armies of dot coms, has produced a counterrevolution, a post-modern protectionism, which is stifling innovation as large corporations use their influence to ring fence their intellectual property, manipulating the law and undermining the open technology of the Internet to suit their own purposes; rewriting copyright and patent legislation to rigidly tax and control the flow of ideas and materials.

As one of the world’s most respected law professors, Lessig is remarkably well qualified to deliver an opinion and we are seeing the evidence all around us today. Large IT vendors are falling over one another to re-engineer any concept of free expression out of the Internet in Asia, while in the United States, a government, hypnotised by the lobbying influence and funding power of big business is sleepwalking into a future defined not by information wealth but by digital rights management.

Inevitably, I suspect, in Lessig’s work we can also witness the future of the Open Source movement, a taste of which we have seen in the recent SCO legal action over Linux. ‘Open’ and ‘Free’ are no longer expressions that sit comforatbly in the minds of the legislators on Capital Hill or with the companies that fund Presidential elections. Already, Microsoft has sought patent protection in Europe and New Zealand for word processing documents stored in XML format. Microsoft argues that there is nothing sinister in this move , explaining that it well "innovate above the standard just as other companies will do in an effort to seek differentiation, address customer needs, add competitive value, etc.," and pointing-out that other companies, such as Sun Microsystems, IBM and Hewlett Packard all have done the same.

However, I thought XML was an ‘Open’ W3C standard and perhaps moves like this go some way towards supporting the suspicion that expressions such as ‘Open’ and ‘Free’ may prove ambiguous and have a rather limited shelf life on the Internet of the future and may be replaced at the very least by a form of patent supported DRM-driven taxation or restriction outside of a pay per view digital economy.


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…