Skip to main content
Actions Speak Louder Than Keystrokes

With media coverage very much focused on the first day of last week’s eCrime congress, day two almost passed unnoticed.

The release of the NOP poll examing ‘The Impact of Hi-tech Crime on UK Business’, had revealed, as expected, that the problem of eCrime continues to grow at the expense of business but its most revealing ‘bombshell’ statistic, was the news that at least three companies had, between them, experienced losses in excess of £60 million. Just as revealing perhaps was the figure for the number of businesses reporting hi-tech crime to the police. Less than 25%, a troubling statistic which strengthens the hands of fraudsters, phishers and extortionists.

On the second day of the conference, Assistant Chief Constable Jim Gamble of the National Crime Squad argued that the National Hi-tech Crime Unit (NHTCU) is everything that SOCA, the new Serious & Organised Crime Agency should aspire to. “Every police officer”, said Gamble, “Needs to understand that eCrime is not just paedophile crime. The police need to be more informed and educated and must realise that the convergence between old and new crime has already taken place. “There is”, he said, “A danger of undermining our own credibility. Talk is cheap and money buys whiskey”, said Gamble and “If we have to find a solution, it may have to be in the absence of government support if necessary”.

He concluded his conference summary by adding,” We don’t want people saying of our hi-tech policing capability, we knew who they were but not what they did”. “Instead”, said Gamble, “We need to be asking what we can do for you”.

On the first day of the conference, Home Office Minister, Caroline Flint MP, gave a well-polished performance, which appeared to reiterate the Government’s intention of throwing legislation and consultation at the eCrime problem and the promise of a strategy to appear very soon.

Jim Paice MP, the shadow police and legal affairs spokesman. Offered a very different impression of progress on day two, quoting from Winston Churchill: “So they, [the Government], go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all-powerful to be impotent”.

“The Conservative Party”, said Paice, “Believes that confidence in the Internet is essential to the future of this country and that the race to deliver 100% eGovernment by 2005 and through digital inclusion, achieve the maximum Broadband penetration among the population without considering the potential impact of eCrime is unwise. This parallels Labour’s race to build the council tower blocks of the 1960’s without giving any thought to the social consequences that accompanied them”.

“We would”, he continued, “Like to call today not only for the swift publication of the Government’s long overdue eCrime strategy document but also for a much broader review of the nation’s eCrime strategy and how Government imagines it can resist the approaching tide of digital crime with the overworked resource at its disposal”?

With four hundred delegates from across the world in the audience eager to express their own views on the problem of hi-tech crime, the conference heard from CitiGroup’s Director of fraud management, Joe Triano, a call for a truly international Hi-tech Crime Agency and once again, from UK delegates, representing the largest institutions and businesses, there was a call for a single organisation in government with authority for all Internet security and crime issues, instead of the present “Home Office problem”.

Delegates agreed that the law is not tough enough on offenders who are invariably punished less than speeding motorists and that the criminal justice system needs to treat more seriously a criminal process that is increasingly threatening brand confidence and the commercial viability of digital business.

Somehow, it was agreed, that business, government and the police must find new ways of sharing information that can lead to a partnership against serious and organised crime on the ground and in cyberspace. “This”, said Jim Paice, “Demands trust and mutual confidence” but how it can be achieved in a practical sense may be a question that is still being asked at next year’s eCrime Congress.


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…