Skip to main content
Technocredulous – Not Me

It’s called technocredulity and it’s the new curse of the 21st century. Defined as ‘The mental acceptance of and conviction in the truth, actuality, strength or validity of one technology over another’, it describes what happens when subjectivity becomes mixed-up with or confused with technology and produces the worst kind of kind of digital fundamentalism.

In reality, human nature remains the same as it has always been. Football replaced chariot racing and bear-baiting and where Windows quickly replaced IBM’s OS/2, Linux looks set to make 2004 its watershed year with both Microsoft and UNIX suffering as a consequence.

The challenge, if you happen to live in the decision-making world of IT is cutting through the expensive marketing fog that surrounds any platform in 2004, from the simple X-Box into the largest Datacenter. The computing world is neatly dividing itself into two camps where spin and propaganda have become as important as White Papers and column inches in shaping opinions.

One problem for us all in the industry today lies in recognising what is impartial and accurate reporting and what is not. The most immediate example surrounds the Windows vs. Linux debate, which is both complex, emotional and frequently misleading, in need of the industry equivalent of the Hutton inquiry to separate fantasy from fact.

Newham Council’s decision to reject Linux because it would pose "unacceptable levels of risk" to council services may be considered a ‘small victory’ for Microsoft in an increasingly fast moving and global struggle between the two computing ideologies but why should countries such as Germany, China, Israel and Thailand be taking an opposite view?

It’s a long story and invariably a question of cost, with Microsoft downplaying potential savings from Linux, arguing that while it may have lower initial licensing fees, in the longer term, its overall costs to businesses in the form of training, support and integration are higher than Windows. Look deeply into the TCO and performance issue however and for each example offered by Microsoft, you’ll find equally compelling arguments from IBM, Sun Microsystems and Hewlett Packard. This leaves what counts for truth occupying a shrinking grey area between the many different strategic marketing interests, an increasingly relative commodity in the struggle between Open Source and proprietary software.

This will, I suspect, be the year that the industry like government, invests in managing expectations and shaping our perceptions, having decided that very few of us have the time or the inclination to wade through the technical arguments.

Watch out for a different style of marketing as the big names experiment with their messages. You see, in 2003 being a customer was good enough but from 2004 you may have to choose sides and become a believer too.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …