Skip to main content
Technocredulous – Not Me

It’s called technocredulity and it’s the new curse of the 21st century. Defined as ‘The mental acceptance of and conviction in the truth, actuality, strength or validity of one technology over another’, it describes what happens when subjectivity becomes mixed-up with or confused with technology and produces the worst kind of kind of digital fundamentalism.



In reality, human nature remains the same as it has always been. Football replaced chariot racing and bear-baiting and where Windows quickly replaced IBM’s OS/2, Linux looks set to make 2004 its watershed year with both Microsoft and UNIX suffering as a consequence.

The challenge, if you happen to live in the decision-making world of IT is cutting through the expensive marketing fog that surrounds any platform in 2004, from the simple X-Box into the largest Datacenter. The computing world is neatly dividing itself into two camps where spin and propaganda have become as important as White Papers and column inches in shaping opinions.

One problem for us all in the industry today lies in recognising what is impartial and accurate reporting and what is not. The most immediate example surrounds the Windows vs. Linux debate, which is both complex, emotional and frequently misleading, in need of the industry equivalent of the Hutton inquiry to separate fantasy from fact.

Newham Council’s decision to reject Linux because it would pose "unacceptable levels of risk" to council services may be considered a ‘small victory’ for Microsoft in an increasingly fast moving and global struggle between the two computing ideologies but why should countries such as Germany, China, Israel and Thailand be taking an opposite view?

It’s a long story and invariably a question of cost, with Microsoft downplaying potential savings from Linux, arguing that while it may have lower initial licensing fees, in the longer term, its overall costs to businesses in the form of training, support and integration are higher than Windows. Look deeply into the TCO and performance issue however and for each example offered by Microsoft, you’ll find equally compelling arguments from IBM, Sun Microsystems and Hewlett Packard. This leaves what counts for truth occupying a shrinking grey area between the many different strategic marketing interests, an increasingly relative commodity in the struggle between Open Source and proprietary software.

This will, I suspect, be the year that the industry like government, invests in managing expectations and shaping our perceptions, having decided that very few of us have the time or the inclination to wade through the technical arguments.

Watch out for a different style of marketing as the big names experiment with their messages. You see, in 2003 being a customer was good enough but from 2004 you may have to choose sides and become a believer too.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…