Skip to main content
The Dunkirk Spirit

The last twelve months may have revealed some uncomfortable gaps in our critical national infrastructure (CNI) that is if you accept that the Internet is part of the package.

Sobig, you may remember played havoc with the BT network and few Internet Service Providers remained working at full capacity as they fended-off one attack after another in the late summer. “We were a little more prepared than BT”, says my own ISP, “But it certainly slowed down our network”.

They hadn't patched....!

These were however, nuisance incidents and business tottered-on, even though many, my own included, had to resort to using a dial-up account when broadband access disappeared for hours at a time.

This year, it may happen again and I doubt many Computer Weekly readers are prepared to bet that 2004 will be a more incident-free year than 2003. As each month passes, the Internet becomes more mission critical to the interests of the nation and I wonder if government are really giving the matter sufficient attention.

Instant communications now has a criticality, which it never quite possessed in the past. Experience shows us that when communications systems fail, they often fail catastrophically, like power outages, leaving large sections of the country cut-off and paralysed from a business perspective.

In the UK, we find our Internet communications centralised around the large ‘pipes’ that connect us with the rest of the world. As an example, Telehouse, in Docklands is a locus for five major networks and manages 80% of London’s communications capacity. Clustered around Telehouse are a number of other companies providing rack space, security and communications for hundreds if not thousands of businesses and if you happen to be looking outside London, then there’s Oswestry, BT’s principal communications centre.

We have, in an age of global terrorism, many, if not all of our eggs in a single basket and I worry over the level of our failover capacity in the event of a concerted viral or physical attack on our communications infrastructure.

Last year, Oliver Letwin suggested that we consider establishing an agency similar to the US Department of Homeland Security. Home Secretary, David Blunkett, promptly shot the idea down in flames. I am not completely in favour of following every example which comes out of Washington but in this case, I think we need to seriously consider protecting our vital communications infrastructure with a well-funded agency and not by committee, which is what I see at present and with it, the risk of a ‘Digital Dunkirk’ one day in the future.

What we have today, is an example of gesture politics and no real understanding of the seriousness of the problem”, said a friend in a conversation on the subject at Westminster. I do hope he’s wrong.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …