Skip to main content
Trust is the strongest weapon of all

Microsoft is leaving no stone unturned in its Trustworthy Computing initiative as it searches for ways to fight viruses and hackers. But its biggest battle is to win over cash-strapped organisations this side of the pond.

The RSA Security Conference in Amsterdam this year saw Microsoft making a powerful effort to display its European credentials around privacy, PKI and information security strategy in general.

Microsoft has been working very hard to ensure that its software meets the approval of the regulators in Brussels, and PKI in Windows 2003 is just one example of how it is attempting to provide the standards framework, in this case, digital signatures, that support the EU’s plans for a more joined-up and e-capable Europe.

Detlef Eckert, Microsoft’s director of Trustworthy Computing for EMEA, conceded that much greater trust, in the computing sense, was needed to bring ICT to the next level.

Tomorrow’s joined-up government," says Eckert, “Can only be built on a secure platform of trusted relationships. It is this management of trust, which represents one of the greatest challenges in the 21st century. Without widely available, reliable and secure trust-based systems and technologies, truly joined-up government is unachievable and e-government can only be an aspiration.”

The head of Microsoft’s security business unit, Mike Nash, offered what is by now, a well-polished message, that the company is leaving no stone unturned – which includes placing a $5m bounty on the heads of virus authors - as it searches for measures to further reduce the risks faced by businesses fighting a constant battle against internet-borne threats.

What worried me a little was that Nash did not appear to fully grasp that Europe wasn’t quite the same place as the US when it came to migration. I pointed out that on this side of the pond, migrating from Windows NT 4.0 was a big deal for many organisations and that quite regardless of the security argument; they weren’t going to suddenly roll out a Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP combination just because Microsoft said so, because of the expense involved in doing so.

This makes Microsoft’s job harder and leaves business more vulnerable to the next big threat, when it arrives and arrive it will.

One question I tried to ask was, “Is Microsoft in the business of security or in the security business?” but Mike Nash could only offer the reply, “both of these."

Personally, I do not believe that Microsoft can continue sit on the fence. In my mind; the company is, increasingly, becoming a security products supplier, by default if not by intention, and NSCGB (formerly known as Palladium), the Next Generation Computing Base and many more initiatives underline this inexorable drift in strategy under Trustworthy Computing.

An interesting sound bite from Mike Nash at the RSA keynote, was the company’s comforting vision of “a place beyond patching”, a revelatory experience, which for many of us will occur, not in this world but ‘In a better place’ regardless of your religion, Orthodox Windows or perhaps even Anglican Linux.

Finally, Tony Neate from the National Hi-tech Crime Unit revealed that my web journal is now popular enough to deserve having its URL hijacked by a UK sex site. I should be flattered but while my name is being borrowed, I’m receiving none of the benefits in return


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…