Skip to main content
Go or No SCO

I’ve been deliberately silent about the legal squabble between SCO (The Santa Cruz Operation) and just about everyone else other than Microsoft over Linux and who owns the rights to the code contained therein – Allegedly.

There are two very good reasons for this. The first being that the editor will, quite probably leave many of my comments ‘On the cutting room floor’ and the second being that litigation stories of this kind are the Computer Weekly equivalent of counting sheep at bedtime.



Not content to fight its corner against IBM, Red Hat and most of the Penguin-fancying world, SCO now plans to frustrate Novell's purchase of SuSE , alleging – that word again – that this would put it in violation of a much older non-competitive agreement, signed in 1995, between Novell and SCO as part of their UNIX System V software agreement.

At the time, Novell was casting around for answers, any answers to the looming inevitability of Windows NT, parked, like the Star Wars ‘Death Star’, right across its corporate parking lot in Utah. UNIX seemed like a good idea at the time as it revealed the weaknesses in Microsoft’s network Operating System ambitions as it started its march off the desktop and into the Enterprise.

Today, Novell has one real chance for survival and that lies with Linux. The Netware, upon which it built the company, represents a law of diminishing returns and Linux is becoming fashionable in all the right places, particularly the poorer sectors of the market where customers are still hanging on to Netware because they can’t afford the costs of a Windows migration. In this respect, one might describe Novell’s acquisition of SuSe as either an upgrade path or a lifeline to its customers.

If SCO stops the deal going through on the basis that a Novell/SuSe Linux competes with its own UNIX-based products, this is only going to further hurt everyone involved in bringing Linux into the mainstream. Already, the IBM and Red Hat involvement is causing a level of nervousness among Enterprise customers. After all, when you buy your software, you want to know who owns what and where the responsibility stops, which has always been a problem with Linux and one that had only been recently resolved before the SCO action appeared on the scene.

The action leaves Novell with a stark choice. Fight SCO through the courts and shelve progress until a decision is made, which could take years if we use the example of Microsoft and Sun Microsystems fighting over Java as an example. Alternatively, pay SCO off because like Novell, SCO is also looking at an uncertain future, built very much upon UNIX in a world that is adopting Linux rapidly. All the legal activity around Linux has stopped SCO dead in the water and from where I sit, it’s best potential revenue stream may come from settlements with the likes of Novell and IBM. Either way, Linux loses until the matter of ownership and non-competitive activity is resolved and Microsoft enjoys a valuable breathing space while it considers how best to react to the potential loss of markets, such as South-east Asia, Germany and Brazil to the Penguin invasion.

Meanwhile, while it’s good to see the strategic importance of Linux reflected in a series of messy legal actions it doesn’t do business any favours and while IBM, Red Hat and Novell tag wrestle with SCO, the rest of us are left wondering how such large companies can behave like so many small children.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…