Skip to main content
Go or No SCO

I’ve been deliberately silent about the legal squabble between SCO (The Santa Cruz Operation) and just about everyone else other than Microsoft over Linux and who owns the rights to the code contained therein – Allegedly.

There are two very good reasons for this. The first being that the editor will, quite probably leave many of my comments ‘On the cutting room floor’ and the second being that litigation stories of this kind are the Computer Weekly equivalent of counting sheep at bedtime.

Not content to fight its corner against IBM, Red Hat and most of the Penguin-fancying world, SCO now plans to frustrate Novell's purchase of SuSE , alleging – that word again – that this would put it in violation of a much older non-competitive agreement, signed in 1995, between Novell and SCO as part of their UNIX System V software agreement.

At the time, Novell was casting around for answers, any answers to the looming inevitability of Windows NT, parked, like the Star Wars ‘Death Star’, right across its corporate parking lot in Utah. UNIX seemed like a good idea at the time as it revealed the weaknesses in Microsoft’s network Operating System ambitions as it started its march off the desktop and into the Enterprise.

Today, Novell has one real chance for survival and that lies with Linux. The Netware, upon which it built the company, represents a law of diminishing returns and Linux is becoming fashionable in all the right places, particularly the poorer sectors of the market where customers are still hanging on to Netware because they can’t afford the costs of a Windows migration. In this respect, one might describe Novell’s acquisition of SuSe as either an upgrade path or a lifeline to its customers.

If SCO stops the deal going through on the basis that a Novell/SuSe Linux competes with its own UNIX-based products, this is only going to further hurt everyone involved in bringing Linux into the mainstream. Already, the IBM and Red Hat involvement is causing a level of nervousness among Enterprise customers. After all, when you buy your software, you want to know who owns what and where the responsibility stops, which has always been a problem with Linux and one that had only been recently resolved before the SCO action appeared on the scene.

The action leaves Novell with a stark choice. Fight SCO through the courts and shelve progress until a decision is made, which could take years if we use the example of Microsoft and Sun Microsystems fighting over Java as an example. Alternatively, pay SCO off because like Novell, SCO is also looking at an uncertain future, built very much upon UNIX in a world that is adopting Linux rapidly. All the legal activity around Linux has stopped SCO dead in the water and from where I sit, it’s best potential revenue stream may come from settlements with the likes of Novell and IBM. Either way, Linux loses until the matter of ownership and non-competitive activity is resolved and Microsoft enjoys a valuable breathing space while it considers how best to react to the potential loss of markets, such as South-east Asia, Germany and Brazil to the Penguin invasion.

Meanwhile, while it’s good to see the strategic importance of Linux reflected in a series of messy legal actions it doesn’t do business any favours and while IBM, Red Hat and Novell tag wrestle with SCO, the rest of us are left wondering how such large companies can behave like so many small children.


Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Big Steal

I’m not here to predict the future;” quipped the novelist, Ray Bradbury. “I’m here to prevent it.” And the future looks much like one where giant corporations who hold the most data, the fastest servers, and the greatest processing power will drive all economic growth into the second half of the century.

We live in an unprecedented time. This in the sense that nobody knows what the world will look like in twenty years; one where making confident forecasts in the face of new technologies becomes a real challenge. Before this decade is over, business leaders will face regular and complex decisions about protecting their critical information and systems as more of the existing solutions they have relied upon are exposed as inadequate.

The few real certainties we have available surround the uninterrupted march of Moore’s Law - the notion that the number of transistors in the top-of-the-line processors doubles approximately every two years - and the unpredictability of human nature. Exper…