Skip to main content
Go or No SCO

I’ve been deliberately silent about the legal squabble between SCO (The Santa Cruz Operation) and just about everyone else other than Microsoft over Linux and who owns the rights to the code contained therein – Allegedly.

There are two very good reasons for this. The first being that the editor will, quite probably leave many of my comments ‘On the cutting room floor’ and the second being that litigation stories of this kind are the Computer Weekly equivalent of counting sheep at bedtime.

Not content to fight its corner against IBM, Red Hat and most of the Penguin-fancying world, SCO now plans to frustrate Novell's purchase of SuSE , alleging – that word again – that this would put it in violation of a much older non-competitive agreement, signed in 1995, between Novell and SCO as part of their UNIX System V software agreement.

At the time, Novell was casting around for answers, any answers to the looming inevitability of Windows NT, parked, like the Star Wars ‘Death Star’, right across its corporate parking lot in Utah. UNIX seemed like a good idea at the time as it revealed the weaknesses in Microsoft’s network Operating System ambitions as it started its march off the desktop and into the Enterprise.

Today, Novell has one real chance for survival and that lies with Linux. The Netware, upon which it built the company, represents a law of diminishing returns and Linux is becoming fashionable in all the right places, particularly the poorer sectors of the market where customers are still hanging on to Netware because they can’t afford the costs of a Windows migration. In this respect, one might describe Novell’s acquisition of SuSe as either an upgrade path or a lifeline to its customers.

If SCO stops the deal going through on the basis that a Novell/SuSe Linux competes with its own UNIX-based products, this is only going to further hurt everyone involved in bringing Linux into the mainstream. Already, the IBM and Red Hat involvement is causing a level of nervousness among Enterprise customers. After all, when you buy your software, you want to know who owns what and where the responsibility stops, which has always been a problem with Linux and one that had only been recently resolved before the SCO action appeared on the scene.

The action leaves Novell with a stark choice. Fight SCO through the courts and shelve progress until a decision is made, which could take years if we use the example of Microsoft and Sun Microsystems fighting over Java as an example. Alternatively, pay SCO off because like Novell, SCO is also looking at an uncertain future, built very much upon UNIX in a world that is adopting Linux rapidly. All the legal activity around Linux has stopped SCO dead in the water and from where I sit, it’s best potential revenue stream may come from settlements with the likes of Novell and IBM. Either way, Linux loses until the matter of ownership and non-competitive activity is resolved and Microsoft enjoys a valuable breathing space while it considers how best to react to the potential loss of markets, such as South-east Asia, Germany and Brazil to the Penguin invasion.

Meanwhile, while it’s good to see the strategic importance of Linux reflected in a series of messy legal actions it doesn’t do business any favours and while IBM, Red Hat and Novell tag wrestle with SCO, the rest of us are left wondering how such large companies can behave like so many small children.


Popular posts from this blog

A Christmas Tale

It’s pitch blackness in places along the sea wall this evening and I'm momentarily startled by a small dog with orange flashing yuletide antlers along the way. I’m the only person crazy enough to be running and I know the route well enough to negotiate it in the dark, part of my Christmas exercise regime and a good way of relieving stress.

Why stress you might ask. After all, it is Christmas Day.

True but I’ve just spent over two hours assembling the giant Playmobil ‘Pony Farm’ set when most other fathers should be asleep in front of the television.

I was warned that the Playmobil ‘Pirate Ship’ had driven some fathers to drink or suicide and now I understand why. If your eyesight isn’t perfect or if you’ve had a few drinks with your Christmas lunch then it’s a challenge best left until Boxing day but not an option if you happen to have a nine year old daughter who wants it ready to take horses by tea time.

Perhaps I should stick to technology but then, the instruc…

A Matter of Drones - Simon Moores for The Guardian

I have a drone on my airfield” – a statement that welcomes passengers to the latest dimension in air-travel disruption. Words of despair from the chief operating officer of Gatwick airport in the busiest travel week of the year. Elsewhere, many thousands of stranded and inconvenienced passengers turned in frustration to social media in an expression of crowd-sourced outrage.

How could this happen? Why is it still happening over 12 hours after Gatwick’s runways were closed to aircraft, why is an intruder drone – or even two of them – suspended in the bright blue sky above the airport, apparently visible to security staff and police who remain quite unable to locate its source of radio control?

Meanwhile, the UK Civil Aviation Authority, overtaken by both the technology and events, is reduced to sending out desperate tweets warning that an airport incursion is a criminal offence and that drone users should follow their new code of conduct. Yet this is not an unforeseen event. It was i…

An Ockham of Gatwick

The 13th century theologian and philosopher, William of Ockham, who once lived in his small Surrey village, not so very far from what is today, the wide concrete expanse of Gatwick airport is a frequently referenced source of intellectual reason. His contribution to modern culture was Ockham’s Razor, which cautions us when problem solving, that “The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct;” sound advice which constantly proves to be true.

A week further-on since Britain’s second busiest airport was bought to a complete standstill by two or perhaps two hundred different drone sightings, it is perhaps time to revisit William of Ockham’s maxim, rather than be led astray by an increasingly bizarre narrative, one which has led Surrey police up several blind alleys with little or nothing in the way of measurable results.

 Exploring the possibilities with a little help in reasoning from our medieval friar, we appear to have a choice of two different account…