Skip to main content
Scrambling for Safety

I’m reading a quote from Ernest Hemingway. “I love to write. But is has never gotten any easier to do and you can’t expect it to if you keep trying for something better than you can do”.

I wonder what Hemingway would have thought of Weblogs? Possibly not a great deal, as most of them are written by teenage girls and are dropped, like boyfriends, once the interest fades.

Yesterday's ‘Scrambling for Safety’ meeting at The London School of Economics went well. My thanks to Simon Davies of the LSE and Privacy International, for inviting me to perform in a cage of hungry lions. I was going to wear a Che Guevara t-shirt but finally settled on a shirt and tie.

Mr Simon Watkin (Home Office) & The Earl of Northesk

It became an epic and rather technical debate between the Home Office on the one side, who believe that interception of data is in the public interest and the privacy lobby, who believe, with some justification that it breaches the European Convention on Human Rights and possibly our own laws as well.

The debate could have lasted longer as both sides believe strongly that their argument is the correct one and it left me, as chair, to sum up to an audience which included peers and MPs.

Personally, while I believe we need appropriate legislation, there is a stark difference between a ‘Blanket’ data retention policy and a ‘Blunkett’ data retention policy. The question I asked was “Is bad legislation justified in pursuit of a sensible purpose”. I believe not. The governments attempts to push through the legislation are not justified in respect of effectiveness, necessity, proportionality or consequence and the Lords would do well to throw it out once it comes in front of them. We need something better and not legislation that risks being overtaken by technology before it appears on the statute books.

See account in PC Pro Magazine and STAND detailed report of the debate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …