Skip to main content
Interview with a Penguin

The first day of ‘The Great Linux Debate’ and my fifth year chairing the event at Linux Expo.



Times have changed. Linux has become more respectable and the beards are no longer as visible as they once were on the show floor. If last year’s theme was loosely based on the 'Addams Family Reunion', then this year found the show suffering from an identity crisis, somewhere between suits and sandals and reflecting the gap between an emerging big business interest in Linux computing and the code warriors who make up the heart of the Open Source movement.



The show floor was visibly smaller than in previous years and if one removed Sun Microsystems, IBM and Hewlett Packard, each there I suspect because the other one was, then there would be little left to see. This worries me a little, if only because after five years, it is still not as large as the Java Show once was.

The debate however appeared to empty the show floor, with over two hundred and fifty people crammed into the auditorium and other squeezed in the aisles outside. For the first time, Microsoft had decided to put in an appearance, to argue its corner against HP, IBM, Sun and SuSe and Microsoft’s Bradley Tipp arrived suitably dressed in black, leaving his Death Star hovering menacingly above London’s Olympia.



This year, the total cost of ownership argument was in full swing. Several members of the audience stood up and explained that using Linux had saved them zillions and that as the server never had to be taken down, they had forgotten how to reboot it. Microsoft’s Tipp avoided having to apologise for inflicting Windows NT on the human race but pointed out that Microsoft products were pretty good and offered customers choice and a single point of accountability. Microsoft might never learn to love Penguins but he could certainly see a future of coexistence in increasingly heterogonous computing environment. “Competition”, said Tipp, “Is good for Microsoft, it makes us do better and Microsoft is behind the development of open standards” He pointed to the relationship between IBM and Microsoft, which prompted a cynical comment from SuSe’s Malcolm Yates on the danger of the two giants locking everyone else out of such ‘open’ standards in the future.

In many respects, the debate had changed little from the previous year. Sun still believes that only Solaris is good enough for ‘heavy-lift’ applications and that Linux belongs at the ‘edge’ of the Enterprise. IBM believes that Linux scales and scales from mobile phones up to Mainframes and Hewlett Packard’s Mike Balma, claims that Linux can’t quite scale all the way yet but will do next year with a little help from Intel.


Taller of the two is not Darth Vader but Adam Jollans. Bradley Tipp from the death star on the right

Will Penguins ever learn to fly, I asked. Has Linux achieved critical mass yet? IBM’s Adam Jollans sees the momentum increasing year on year and for the first time, the audience at Linux Expo reflects signs of serious Enterprise adoption of Open Source solutions, reinforcing the view that choosing Linux is no longer simply a protest vote against Microsoft but a politico-economic statement which rejects the inevitability of a single standard of computing.

Asked if Linux represented a victory of ideology over technology the best answer from the panel came from Microsoft, that “Linux represents an ideology in combination with technology”, a contradiction that Microsoft still struggles to find the answers to.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …