Skip to main content
Send in the Marines

Trust, if there’s no room for it in politics, is there a place for it in computing?

Trust has, like cornflakes, has become a commodity. In the dictionary, it is defined as ‘Firm reliance on the integrity, ability, or character of a person or thing’ and if something is ‘Trustworthy’, then it ‘Warrants trust is reliable’.

Place computing and trust together in the same sentence and tell me if it feels right? Is there such a thing as ‘Trustworthy Computing’ or has Microsoft made a mistake by placing so much emphasis and indeed, its credibility, on the ‘T’ word?



I happened to turn the television on this evening and discovered that Channel 4 was showing the John Wayne film of the Vietnam War, ‘The Green Berets’. It struck me watching the film out of the corner of my eye and writing this column at the same time, that there was an analogy for me to draw upon from the story. One side, led by the heroic Wayne, ‘Colonel Kirby’ relies on a heady mix of optimism and overwhelming firepower, to keep someone called ‘Charlie’ outside the barbed wire perimeter of the jungle camp but “What”, says Kirby, “Happens if Charlie hits this camp before it’s completed”?

Charlie, you see, has a habit of “Sneaking through the wire at night” and I’m equally reminded that Microsoft has spent the equivalent of a small country’s GDP trying to build more ‘Trust’ into it’s products but on a month-by-month basis Charlie and his friends, continue to probe and find their way through the gaps in the wire and as long as these gaps keep appearing in Windows or even Linux, then any real suggestion of trust in the computing space remains an out of reach abstraction.

Every other night harassment”, remarks Colonel Nim. “It’s pretty good shooting”, says Colonel Kirby, referring to the damage Charlie is causing. “Yes” says Nim “But they have eyes in our camp

Have the events of the Summer, W32 Blaster, Sobig-F, Welchia and more, quite possibly before this column is published, irreparably damaged our confidence in the Windows environment or are consumers and businesses more likely now to recognise that we are caught in the crossfire of an undeclared war for control of cyberspace, where Windows just happens to be the most prominent and often, most vulnerable victim? It may not matter that this month’s statistics suggest that Linux is now the more popular target because most of us depend on Microsoft plugging the gaps in its software perimeter before Charlie exploits them on our Servers.

Can patching ever work efficiently or even effectively? I’ve heard it suggested in the last week that Microsoft should send every customer on the face of the planet a CD with the latest patches and Service Pack. This may seem like a good idea, after all, I would be online all day from a dial-up connection, updating my four PCs but by the time the CD arrived in the post there likely would be something else to worry about on patch Wednesday.

I really don’t believe that businesses are prepared to let Microsoft or any other software company, such as Sun, take patching to its logical conclusion and patch their systems automatically through an evolution of ‘Windows Update’. Interoperability still remains a myth in this business and patches, which can and often do carry errors, occasionally wreak havoc which expensive and mission-critical production systems and occasionally even desktop PCs.

So, let me know through the mailbag. Was this summer an unfortunate hiccough and is Microsoft’s Trustworthy Computing campaign while bruised and bleeding, still relatively intact in both principle and practise? And can patching ever work effectively enough to stop Charlie creeping through the wire and causing the multi-million pound levels of business interruption seen this summer?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mainframe to Mobile

Not one of us has a clue what the world will look like in five years’ time, yet we are all preparing for that future – As  computing power has become embedded in everything from our cars and our telephones to our financial markets, technological complexity has eclipsed our ability to comprehend it’s bigger picture impact on the shape of tomorrow.

Our intuition has been formed by a set of experiences and ideas about how things worked during a time when changes were incremental and somewhat predictable. In March 1953. there were only 53 kilobytes of high-speed RAM on the entire planet.

Today, more than 80 per cent of the value of FTSE 500* firms is ‘now dark matter’: the intangible secret recipe of success; the physical stuff companies own and their wages bill accounts for less than 20 per cent: a reversal of the pattern that once prevailed in the 1970s. Very soon, Everything at scale in this world will be managed by algorithms and data and there’s a need for effective platforms for ma…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.


In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …