Skip to main content
Open Source – Open Season

August may be a month that Microsoft would rather forget and September is shaping-up for a set of different problems.

Microsoft remains uncomfortably trapped between a rock and a hard place as it seeks to deliver credible arguments that support both the investment it has made in ‘Trustworthy Computing’ and its position in respect to the rapid spread of care in the ‘Community Software’, which is becoming an increasingly persistent nuisance to the Seattle giant. This week, the company released the results of a study by Forrester Research commissioned by Microsoft that claims Windows and the .Net platform is substantially cheaper than J2EE/Linux when it comes to application development, deployment and maintenance

Since Japan's trade minister, Takeo Hirunama, raised security concerns over Microsoft's software at the ASEAN economics ministers meeting, there is talk of Asia going its own way with a rival Open Source Operating System to Windows. Referring to the recent attacks on Windows software, minister Hiranuma remarked it would be useful to "pursue a new kind, a different kind, of software code." The Japanese media have reported that the government would spend $86 million on an Open Source development project and forum set up by Japan's electronics manufacturers. In response, Microsoft has been at pains to stress its 'Government Security Program', launched in January, aims to address concerns by governments over the reliability and security of Microsoft's software by providing source access as well as technical advice on security


In the United States, The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) has urged The Department of Homeland Security to reconsider its decision to use Microsoft software on its desktop and server systems. It cites "major security failures" created by the raft of vulnerabilities in the Windows Operating System and some security specialists are now advocating direct regulation, in the form of legislation that makes software companies liable for damage caused by security flaws in their products.



"The government has essentially relied on the voluntary efforts of industry both to make less buggy software and make systems more resilient," said Michael Vatis, former director of the National Infrastructure Protection Center at the FBI. "What we're seeing is that those voluntary efforts are insufficient, and the repercussions are vast."

For a moment though, we need to add back a little perspective into the debate. Sun Microsystems reportedly had twenty security alerts in August and these included Linux. This news rather passed us by because an overwhelming number of us prefer to use Microsoft’s products and Microsoft has become a victim of its own success in giving us what we asked for in off-the-shelf commodity software where consistency and ease of use was the primary attraction and security was an option.

There are two arguments at work here and it is almost impossible to separate them in overworked debate, which increasingly surrounds one’s choice of vendor or Operating System. Many of us might concede that a more ‘up-front’ and responsible Microsoft is has made significant steps where product security is concerned but the company’s broader efforts are being frustrated by society’s consistent failure to treat Internet security seriously and every time a new virus appears, another million or so unpatched Lemmings follow it over the nearest cliff.

The public rightly expects bulletproof software but it is not going to get it and needs to understand that the responsibility for fighting viruses, worms and hackers works both ways. Microsoft, like Ford, can spend a few billion extra on safety enhancements but in a comparative sense, the superhighway is no safer than the road outside my house if I choose to ignore the dangers. Over time, security will improve beyond all recognition and viruses may one day become a bad memory on any platform but I doubt very much it will be this side of 2010.

Finally, we have the cost of ownership argument, which says that if enough countries back an alternative Operating System, then computing costs will drop dramatically and everyone in China or India will live happily ever after. This may be true but we live in a global economy and need to recognise that the world is now dominated by a handful of large IT vendors, split across an Operating System fault-line and driven by a strong profit motive. Much like searching for the best price for a cross-channel trip, the market will, in the end, find its own equilibrium and whether you choose the tunnel or the ferry, Linux or Windows, the prices may look remarkably similar.

If you have a view of your own to share, then there is some good news. For four years, I have been chairing ‘The Great Linux Debate’ at the Linux Expo, which this year is at lunchtime on the 8th and 9th October at Olympia. For the first time, I have managed to persuade Microsoft to sit on the panel and argue its position against IBM, Hewlett, Sun Microsystems, Hewlett Packard, SuSe and others. Audience participation in the Jerry Springer style is encouraged and all are welcome.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Median Saleh

I mentioned in the last post, the 1981 expedition that took in Median Saleh, the ruined Nabatean city in Saudi Arabia


A temple carved from the rock from Petra's sister city.

By coincidence, one of the most important train stations on the Hejaz railway sat next to the ruins and when Lawrence of Arabia blew the line in 1917, the trains were trapped there and are still there today, gathering dust and with "Krupp" on the engine casings.


One of the trains, sitting where T.E. Lawrence left themwith Dr Paul Garnett as the passenger

Below, you can see one of the fortified train stations that Lawrence attacked along the Hejaz railway between Damascus and Medina.



More photos Medain Saleh can be found on THIS Site - Apparently you can catch a tourist bus these days, rather different from risking life and limb to cross an unfriendly Saudi Arabia twenty years ago!
A Christmas Tale

It’s pitch blackness in places along the sea wall this evening and I'm momentarily startled by a small dog with orange flashing yuletide antlers along the way. I’m the only person crazy enough to be running and I know the route well enough to negotiate it in the dark, part of my Christmas exercise regime and a good way of relieving stress.

Why stress you might ask. After all, it is Christmas Day.

True but I’ve just spent over two hours assembling the giant Playmobil ‘Pony Farm’ set when most other fathers should be asleep in front of the television.



I was warned that the Playmobil ‘Pirate Ship’ had driven some fathers to drink or suicide and now I understand why. If your eyesight isn’t perfect or if you’ve had a few drinks with your Christmas lunch then it’s a challenge best left until Boxing day but not an option if you happen to have a nine year old daughter who wants it ready to take horses by tea time.

Perhaps I should stick to technology but then, the instruc…

A Matter of Drones - Simon Moores for The Guardian

I have a drone on my airfield” – a statement that welcomes passengers to the latest dimension in air-travel disruption. Words of despair from the chief operating officer of Gatwick airport in the busiest travel week of the year. Elsewhere, many thousands of stranded and inconvenienced passengers turned in frustration to social media in an expression of crowd-sourced outrage.

How could this happen? Why is it still happening over 12 hours after Gatwick’s runways were closed to aircraft, why is an intruder drone – or even two of them – suspended in the bright blue sky above the airport, apparently visible to security staff and police who remain quite unable to locate its source of radio control?

Meanwhile, the UK Civil Aviation Authority, overtaken by both the technology and events, is reduced to sending out desperate tweets warning that an airport incursion is a criminal offence and that drone users should follow their new code of conduct. Yet this is not an unforeseen event. It was i…