Skip to main content
Demand A Bigger Windows Box for All

Another day, another case study and this time, it’s a large German financial institution and how it tackled the challenge of securely managing client and partner access to its applications over a large IP network.

A useful aspect of writing so many case studies involving some very large and high profile businesses, is that under non-disclosure, one sees what is really happening, where the application of technology can make a difference and even where it can’t.

Take the Skipton Building society as an example. A Unisys and Microsoft customer, it reduced its annual IT costs by £3 million through replacing a mainframe and seventy line of business servers with eight of Unisys’ big ES7000 servers, a mix of 8-way and 32-way SMP units with 208 Intel processors between them and making this the largest ES7000 implementation of its kind in the UK.

Stories like this are not just about consolidation and cost saving, although this represents a strong factor in the decision process. They are also about storage, disaster recovery and security and just as importantly using the consolidation principle to facilitate a return to running a successful business rather than a large and constantly expanding IT shop.

The same is true elsewhere. One company I’m studying at the moment has a thousand servers, which they are sensibly consolidating into two ‘Windows Mainframes’ and another European city government is streamlining its administration in much the same way.

When I first explored the idea of a ‘Windows Mainframe’ four years ago, I was a little cynical. After all, this was still barely “Windows 2000” and if you discussed its scalability and reliability in contrast with UNIX with other analysts, they giggled.

Today, it is a rather different story because the ES7000, Windows Datacenter combination not only works but it works incredibly well. Add an EMC or Symmetrix storage solution and a disaster recovery programme and you have IT Directors happily offering comments like “We now have the resilience of a mainframe system combined with the flexibility of Windows”, or “It proves that Microsoft can produce mission critical systems”.

Stepping back for a moment to reflect, comments like these are coming from businesses that frequently underpin the economy of their countries. I can think back to the launch of Windows NT years ago at the first ‘NT show’ at London’s Olympia, when Nat West bank presented its case for choosing the product. The more informed journalist in the audience, the usual suspects, whispered among themselves knowingly and sure enough, Nat West’s enthusiasm for NT looked decidedly premature when things started to go expensively wrong a little later. At the time, Windows NT was clearly not up to the job in terms of scalability or reliability and at one point, you could see the visible result in Nat West cash-points when they crashed but today it is a very different story. If you ask the customer where the problems were, then you are more likely to receive a ‘culture of change’ reply than one, which identifies a scalability or reliability problem, which I have yet to hear.

Can you then squeeze a national bank into two or three window boxes? The answer appears to be a convincing 'Yes'. Sure, there will still be legacy applications and systems floating around which need a reliable UNIX host but in another study I am working on, I have the example of a bank, which uses the same ES7000 to manage its email during the day and process the previous day’s transactions in a seven-hour overnight ‘window’. In this case, they could not find another solution, which could serve the same mission-critical dual purpose on budget, and in the time, they had available for the processing run.

So I’m sold, if only because as one of the UK’s officially rated and ‘most cynical columnists’, I’m being told that consolidation works because it solves the expensive administrative problem of ‘server creep’. Of course you can have hundreds if not thousands of cheap commodity servers if you wish but visit the large organisations who are trying to manage them and they will tell you that a single Datacenter with a few large window boxes is much easier to administer and can like the Skipton, save the business millions in IT costs.

So bigger appears to be better and every large company should have its own large windows box perhaps, unless of course managing a thousand different servers sounds like a good idea?


Popular posts from this blog

Civilisational Data Mining

It’s a new expression I haven’t heard before. ‘Civilisational data mining.’

Let me start by putting it in some context. Every character, you or I have typed into the Google search engine or Facebook over the last decade, means something, to someone or perhaps ‘something,’ if it’s an algorithm.

In May 2014, journalists revealed that the United States National Security Agency, the NSA, was recording and archiving every single cell-phone conversation that took place in the Bahamas. In the process they managed to transform a significant proportion of a society’s day to day interactions into unstructured data; valuable information which can of course be analysed, correlated and transformed for whatever purpose the intelligence agency deems fit.

And today, I read that a GOP-hired data company in the United States has ‘leaked’ personal information, preferences and voting intentions on… wait for it… 198 million US citizens.

Within another decade or so, the cost of sequencing the human genome …

The Nature of Nurture?

Recently, I found myself in a fascinating four-way Twitter exchange, with Professor Adam Rutherford and two other science-minded friends The subject, frequently regarded as a delicate one, genetics and whether there could exist an unknown but contributory genetic factor(s) or influences in determining what we broadly understand or misunderstand as human intelligence.

I won’t discuss this subject in any great detail here, being completely unqualified to do so, but I’ll point you at the document we were discussing, and Rutherford’s excellent new book, ‘A Brief History of Everyone.”

What had sparked my own interest was the story of my own grandfather, Edmond Greville; unless you are an expert on the history of French cinema, you are unlikely to have ever hear of him but he still enjoys an almost cult-like following for his work, half a century after his death.

I've been enjoying the series "Genius" on National Geographic about the life of Albert Einstein. The four of us ha…
The Mandate of Heaven

eGov Monitor Version

“Parliament”, said my distinguished friend “has always leaked like a sieve”.

I’m researching the thorny issue of ‘Confidence in Public Sector Computing’ and we were discussing the dangers presented by the Internet. In his opinion, information security is an oxymoron, which has no place being discussed in a Parliament built upon the uninterrupted flow of information of every kind, from the politically sensitive to the most salacious and mundane.

With the threat of war hanging over us, I asked if MPs should be more aware of the risks that surround this new communications medium? More importantly, shouldn’t the same policies and precautions that any business might use to protect itself and its staff, be available to MPs?

What concerns me is that my well-respected friend mostly considers security in terms of guns, gates and guards. He now uses the Internet almost as much as he uses the telephone and the Fax machine and yet the growing collective t…